Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+SLP\s+duplications\s+for\s+VMDK\s+$flashbackup\-windows$\s+images\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+SLP\s+duplications\s+for\s+VMDK\s+$flashbackup\-windows$\s+images\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] SLP duplications for VMDK (flashbackup-windows) images. (score: 1): Author: John Meyers <john.meyers AT wright DOT edu>; Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 10:01:13 -0400; Currently running NetBackup 7.1.0.3 and wondering if there is any support for using SLP's to duplicate VMDK backup images created using flashbackup-windows type policies? If I try to designate an SLP; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2012-07/msg00014.html (11,603 bytes)
2. Re: [Veritas-bu] SLP duplications for VMDK (flashbackup-windows) images. (score: 1): Author: Rusty Major <rusty.major AT sungard DOT com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 12:41:40 -0500; John, You're on the right track. That message is related to the VMDK backups and not SLPs. The policy will do a sort of pre-check when you apply or save the changes. An SLP doesn't care what type of; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2012-07/msg00015.html (12,888 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]