Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Restore\s+is\s+faster\s+than\s+backup\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] Restore is faster than backup (score: 1)
Author: atif76 AT gmail DOT com (Atif Munir)
Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 10:52:28 +0500
Dear All, I have a very much confusing issue. We have a SF6900 with 2TB storage from HDS running Solaris 9. Every time I take backup of the filesystem or database I am getting an average speed of 50M
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-05/msg00143.html (10,756 bytes)

2. [Veritas-bu] Restore is faster than backup (score: 1)
Author: ewilts AT ewilts DOT org (Ed Wilts)
Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 03:18:33 -0500
It can be hard on the client to walk a file system trying to figure out what to back up. If you've got lots of little files, this can especially be true. It's quite likely that NetBackup has to do a
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-05/msg00144.html (11,372 bytes)

3. [Veritas-bu] Restore is faster than backup (score: 1)
Author: simon.weaver AT astrium.eads DOT net (WEAVER, Simon)
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 06:48:35 +0100
Could depend on what is being backed up I guess. What is the Network configuration like? Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (D
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-05/msg00146.html (12,150 bytes)

4. [Veritas-bu] Restore is faster than backup (score: 1)
Author: Shekhar.Dhotre AT lendlease DOT com (Dhotre, Shekhar)
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 02:33:49 -0400
My experience : Restore is always faster than backups. So ,whatever you see is correct. Shekhar Dhotre ICT Storage Engineering. v 404.846.7483 | f 404.848.1077 Shekhar.dhotre AT bovislendlease DOT co
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-05/msg00148.html (14,080 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu