Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Image\s+Database\s+consistency\s+check\s+\-\s+interpretting\s+output\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Image\s+Database\s+consistency\s+check\s+\-\s+interpretting\s+output\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] Image Database consistency check - interpretting output (score: 1): Author: vandevegt AT yahoo DOT com (Jim VandeVegt); Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 11:51:10 -0700 (PDT); I've been using bpexpdate -recalculate ... to apply new expiration dates to images that previously had infinity retentions. I started getting the error message: "event out of order, database inconsis; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-06/msg00016.html (12,538 bytes)
2. [Veritas-bu] Image Database consistency check - interpretting output (score: 1): Author: vandevegt AT yahoo DOT com (Jim VandeVegt); Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:44:30 -0700 (PDT); OK, so now that I have looked at that output, I see a whole bunch of "Bad image header" and file "does not exist" errors. I'm going from memory, but I think the time frame where these images have sh; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-06/msg00080.html (11,867 bytes)
3. [Veritas-bu] Image Database consistency check - interpretting output (score: 1): Author: scott.kendall AT abbott DOT com (scott.kendall AT abbott DOT com); Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:39:16 -0500; I know for a fact that I have seen an article about this on Veritas's web site. Sorry, and hopefully someone from Veritas is listening, but I never have any luck finding things on the web site. It se; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-06/msg00105.html (15,005 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]