Author: pkoster at ci.grand-rapids.mi.us ("Koster, Phil")
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:13:13 -0400
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20060921/00a4ccb2/attachment.txt -- next part -- An HT
Author: simon.weaver at astrium.eads.net (WEAVER, Simon)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:35:50 +0100
In one policy I have 30 clients - its a monthly policy and backups up all the local drives ! Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA I
Author: Steve.Haskins at bannerhealth.com (Haskins, Steve)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:41:01 -0700
A lot of variables are induced into policy creation but on average I have 10 clients per policy. Some have one and some have 40. --Original Message-- From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.ed
Author: simon.weaver at astrium.eads.net (WEAVER, Simon)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:45:16 +0100
As a general rule, I try to minimise the amounts of policies I have. Used to have SO many, that I have taken at least 15 away. As long as the backups work, I am happy Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Te
Author: pcd at xinupro.com (Peter DrakeUnderkoffler)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:49:09 -0400
Not really a useful stat. Everyone's NBU implementation is generally different based on lots of factors. Clients may or may not be bundled into policies for business or security reasons, platform com
Author: JMARTI05 at intersil.com (Martin, Jonathan (Contractor))
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:52:29 -0400
Presently 3.8 but with our upgrade to 6.0 and my recreating many policies we'll be moving towards the 1.0 number. Unfortunately the minute level of detail most of my customers require is more and mor
Author: austin.murphy at gmail.com (Austin Murphy)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:39:01 -0400
We are at 5.33 clients/policy (Unique clients/All policies). For our two primary file backup policies the ratio is 45.0. The Database, Exchange, SAN media server, special system, vault, and inactive
I agree with Phil on this...we group clients by dataset and proximity to the nearest media server. So, that number is high for things like Exchange backups where we have over 20 Exchange servers and
Author: cjmanders at lbl.gov (Christopher Jay Manders)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 09:28:55 -0700
We also try to group together systems to minimize policy bloat. Our biggest policies hold ~300+ clients each. Windows_Desktops is by far the biggest, but with our Standard_Evening policy (Mac & UNIX)
Author: pkoster at ci.grand-rapids.mi.us ("Koster, Phil")
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:55:20 -0400
It's a partially fair question. For the most part we all have standard environments in that some aspects and very standard and some servers/solutions are very unique. So from a ratio perspective, if
Author: JMARTI05 at intersil.com (Martin, Jonathan (Contractor))
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:30:21 -0400
Not to interject, but I'm thinking quite the opposite here. Every server I backup is somewhat unique, and I need to be able to custom tailor what gets backed up when and how. Despite my company's gen
Author: austin.murphy at gmail.com (Austin Murphy)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:38:29 -0400
... There are several ways to throttle the impact of NetBackup on your network and servers. Storage Unit: * Maximum concurrent drives used for backup Policy: * Limit jobs per policy * Allow multiple