Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+EMC\s+Backup\s+Advisor\s+vs\s+Aptare\s+StorageConsole\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+EMC\s+Backup\s+Advisor\s+vs\s+Aptare\s+StorageConsole\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] EMC Backup Advisor vs Aptare StorageConsole (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Whittaker" <Kevin.Whittaker AT syniverse DOT com>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:18:56 -0400; All, I am narrowing down my search for a reporting tool to these 2 products. Does anybody have any experience with both of these? How was the install and configuration? (length and complications) Do; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00038.html (11,785 bytes)
2. Re: [Veritas-bu] EMC Backup Advisor vs Aptare StorageConsole (score: 1): Author: ckstehman AT pepco DOT com; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 13:03:41 -0400; Greetings We have been using Aptare for 5 years now, and are happy with it. Backup Exec, Tivoli Storage Manager, EMC Legato NetWorker and HP Data Protector. in any combination. The install and config; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00045.html (15,208 bytes)
3. Re: [Veritas-bu] EMC Backup Advisor vs Aptare StorageConsole (score: 1): Author: "Ed Wilts" <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 22:27:42 -0500; We’ve been running Aptare’s StorageConsole for several years. The install is fairly easy and if you need help, Aptare will help you. I’m guessing that the install was done in an hou; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00056.html (15,970 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]