Author: "Jeremy Finn" <jeremy.finn AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:03:02 -0400
Hello, I am trying to achieve the streaming of five mount points on an HP-UX client to one LTO-1 tape drive. I have run into a strange issue though. If I set multistreaming to five, and multiplexing
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:19:22 -0400 (EDT)
On the drives themselves within the storage unit I set them to 32 (max) so then in polices and what have you, you can set it to what you want appropriately. For your file list you should list the pat
Symantec support has instructed me to turn off multistreaming in the policy, and leave multiplexing set to five. When I do this, there is only one job in the activity monitor for the client, and I ca
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:30:42 -0400 (EDT)
With >= 5.1 I do not think this is required anymore. (e.g. the NEW_STREAM directive is not needed) With <= 4.5_FPX I think it was required. But agree with the concept, yup! __________________________
Author: "Jeremy Finn" <jeremy.finn AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:18:40 -0400
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Dean wrote: I don't really know why you would be getting 5 streams per mount point. I have never seen this. But then, I haven't messed with include and exclude lists like you de
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:04:07 -0400 (EDT)
Jeremy, 1. Use two policies. 2. mkdir the same mounts on each server (hackish way of doing things, but may be necessary in some cases) As long as the paths exist, empty or not, that will eliminate th
Author: "Jeremy Finn" <jeremy.finn AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:40:41 -0400
Thanks Justin. I think using two policies for this going to work. The NEW_STREAM directive and individual pathnames is streaming five file systems at a time to one tape drive. Now on to testing resto