Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Does\s+CryptoStor\s+Tape\s+play\s+nice\s+with\s+SSO\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] Does CryptoStor Tape play nice with SSO? (score: 1)
Author: Jason.Ellis at indymacbank.com (Ellis, Jason)
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:22:24 -0800
Does anybody use NeoScale's CryptoStor Tape to encrypt the data on their tapes with NetBackup? We are looking at this solution to encrypt our data, but I'm wondering how well this middleware product
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-12/msg00155.html (11,233 bytes)

2. [Veritas-bu] Does CryptoStor Tape play nice with SSO? (score: 1)
Author: HallC at SEC.GOV (Hall, Christian N.)
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:40:32 -0500
It's an appliance that works at the device level, what does that have to do with SSO? ________________________________ Does anybody use NeoScale's CryptoStor Tape to encrypt the data on their tapes w
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-12/msg00158.html (11,721 bytes)

3. [Veritas-bu] Does CryptoStor Tape play nice with SSO? (score: 1)
Author: ewilts at ewilts.org (Ed Wilts)
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 18:56:04 -0600
Because it works at the device level, it needs to behave nicely when shared between multiple hosts. You're playing with SCSI reservations, and if it doesn't handle them well you're going to be in a w
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-12/msg00164.html (12,439 bytes)

4. [Veritas-bu] Does CryptoStor Tape play nice with SSO? (score: 1)
Author: KEagle at wilmingtontrust.com (Eagle, Kent)
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 13:49:46 -0500
Jason, We've been using several CryptoStor FC702 models for over a year now. Our shop is Win2K3 Master & Media servers, with 7 FC LTO2 drives in a robot. They are all SSO. We chose the CryptoStor pro
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-12/msg00184.html (13,008 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu