Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+status\s+last\s+backup\s+completion\s+using\s+nsradmin\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] status last backup completion using nsradmin (score: 1)
Author: Napoleon Urgena <napoleon.urgena AT WALGREENS DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:31:03 -0500
NW 7.1.1 I have a client in a savegroup for running a hot DB backup. I can get the status using nsradmin to see if the backup is running or not and how much is left to complete. But would anyone know
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-12/msg00035.html (12,596 bytes)

2. Re: [Networker] status last backup completion using nsradmin (score: 1)
Author: Stan Horwitz <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:35:18 -0500
Why not use mminfo? Something like "mminfo -aX -c" might provide the information you seek if you look at the "Recent Save Set Usage Summary" that appears at the end of the report. -- Note: To sign of
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-12/msg00036.html (13,083 bytes)

3. Re: [Networker] status last backup completion using nsradmin (score: 1)
Author: Darren Dunham <ddunham AT TAOS DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 08:51:05 -0800
Savegroup completion isn't really stored in any networker database. The savegroup itself sends the information via any notifications and into logs. If the server hasn't been restarted and the group
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-12/msg00038.html (13,951 bytes)

4. Re: [Networker] status last backup completion using nsradmin (score: 1)
Author: Napoleon Urgena <napoleon.urgena AT WALGREENS DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:53:29 -0500
I have a script using nsradmin to status the backup. When the status=idle, I want to find out if the savegroup's last backup completed successful or failed. I'll do some research on mminfo. Thanks fo
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-12/msg00039.html (12,973 bytes)

5. Re: [Networker] status last backup completion using nsradmin (score: 1)
Author: Darren Dunham <ddunham AT TAOS DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 09:20:08 -0800
The group as a whole, or just individual save sessions? And what's a failure to you? Is one file saying "size changed" a failure, or does an entire host have to be down? If you're just waiting for t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-12/msg00041.html (13,813 bytes)

6. Re: [Networker] status last backup completion using nsradmin (score: 1)
Author: Napoleon Urgena <napoleon.urgena AT WALGREENS DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 12:44:17 -0500
That is closer to what I'm looking for. I only need to know wether the group failed (or aborted) or passed as you would see on the top of the completion report. If it could tell me it was aborted, th
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-12/msg00046.html (12,958 bytes)

7. Re: [Networker] status last backup completion using nsradmin (score: 1)
Author: Teresa Biehler <tpbsys AT RIT DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:45:45 -0500
I get "X lines of suppressed output" when I do this. Is there a way to force all the output to be written? Thanks. Teresa The group as a whole, or just individual save sessions? And what's a failure
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-12/msg00061.html (14,746 bytes)

8. Re: [Networker] status last backup completion using nsradmin (score: 1)
Author: Darren Dunham <ddunham AT TAOS DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 07:48:43 -0800
I'm not certain. That may be coming directly from the client, not from the server. But I've not attempted to expand it in the past. -- Darren Dunham ddunham AT taos DOT com Senior Technical Consulta
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-12/msg00062.html (13,442 bytes)

9. Re: [Networker] status last backup completion using nsradmin (score: 1)
Author: Itzik Meirson <imeirson AT MBI.CO DOT IL>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 17:57:13 +0200
Sometime in the past, probably around 6.1.3, Legato started suppressing lines to avoid overloading the "NSR group" resource with text. If you are aware of the consequences and want to avoid this supp
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-12/msg00063.html (17,194 bytes)

10. Re: [Networker] status last backup completion using nsradmin (score: 1)
Author: Teresa Biehler <tpbsys AT RIT DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 11:02:25 -0500
This file already exists and I'm still getting lines that are suppressed. We're running v7.1.1. -Teresa Sometime in the past, probably around 6.1.3, Legato started suppressing lines to avoid overload
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-12/msg00064.html (17,585 bytes)

11. Re: [Networker] status last backup completion using nsradmin (score: 1)
Author: Darren Dunham <ddunham AT TAOS DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 08:12:19 -0800
Should that be on the client or server? (Which one is doing the consolidation?) -- Darren Dunham ddunham AT taos DOT com Senior Technical Consultant TAOS http://www.taos.com/ Got some Dr Pepper? San
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-12/msg00065.html (13,605 bytes)

12. Re: [Networker] status last backup completion using nsradmin (score: 1)
Author: Itzik Meirson <imeirson AT MBI.CO DOT IL>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 18:17:31 +0200
Legato suggests to restart Networker services after creating this file. This seems to be quite strange as if you do a "strings" on key Networker executables this string exists only in "savegrp". This
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-12/msg00066.html (20,264 bytes)

13. Re: [Networker] status last backup completion using nsradmin (score: 1)
Author: Teresa Biehler <tpbsys AT RIT DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 11:19:26 -0500
I created this file several months ago. In the meantime, our server has been restarted many times. -T Legato suggests to restart Networker services after creating this file. This seems to be quite st
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-12/msg00067.html (20,518 bytes)

14. Re: [Networker] status last backup completion using nsradmin (score: 1)
Author: Kit Cunningham <kit AT 4F.CO DOT NZ>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 08:08:15 +1300
There is a bug in 7.1.1 where the no_supress file is ignored. Kit -- Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-12/msg00069.html (19,149 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu