Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+networker\s+vs\s+arcserve\s+performance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+networker\s+vs\s+arcserve\s+performance\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] networker vs arcserve performance (score: 1): Author: mark wragge <mark_t_wragge AT YAHOO DOT IE>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:43:38 +0000; Hi, does anyone have any performance experience using Arcserve 11.1 rather than networker? If I have identical hardware configuration for each software then should i see a difference in performance b; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2007-03/msg00132.html (11,675 bytes)
2. [Networker] networker vs arcserve performance (score: 1): Author: Fazil Saiyed <fazil.saiyed AT ANIXTER DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:10:40 -0400; I am very dissapointed with Networker Media Managment and Failure alerts, but you really cannot compare Arcserve with Networker, i have used Archserve off and on, it's nothing but trouble, so if you; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2007-03/msg00170.html (11,258 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]