Author: "Myles, Laura M" <laura.myles AT PNL DOT GOV>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 10:45:14 -0800
What's up with that? Have any of you seen this? We have file servers with 5 (500GB) drives that networker has chunked into a bunch of 2GB savesets To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT lis
Author: Fazil Saiyed <Fazil.Saiyed AT ANIXTER DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 13:23:11 -0600
Hello, I believe networker backs up the data in 2 GB increments, this behavior may have changed with later versions, but that's as far as i know. The saveset on the tape should be divided in several
Author: "Goslin, Paul" <pgoslin AT CINCOM DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:31:11 -0500
The last time I remember large save-sets being broken up into 2 GB chunks was quite a few releases ago, like 6.x ??? To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type
Author: "Browning, David" <DBrown AT LSUHSC DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 13:43:30 -0600
I think it was version 6, but it might be older than that - maybe 5.x or 4.x. The business suite module also played a part in this, but I can't recall for sure. I remember our Exchange backups being
Author: Kevin Malone <kcmalone AT SALISBURY DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:49:25 -0500
I know that Novell servers still did this even with Networker 7.2.1 with older versions of the Netware module, but other than that, this has to be an old version. Kevin Malone Network Administrator S
Author: "Browning, David" <DBrown AT LSUHSC DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 13:55:10 -0600
Well, this got me thinking, so I dug through some old daemon logs from December 2004. We were using Networker 7.1, but an older version of Exchange business suite module. The only data that was being
Author: Fazil Saiyed <Fazil.Saiyed AT ANIXTER DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:26:28 -0600
Also remember that certain condition must exist for this behavior to occur. i.e client is slow to backup , networker parallelism is high or higher. Tape speed is faster then data coming into networke
Author: Michael Nored <mrnored AT NETZERO DOT NET>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:29:17 -0500
Perhaps it would help if you told us what type of file server you are running and also what version of the NetWorker Server / Client software they are running. Also are these file servers new clients
Author: Len Philpot <Len.Philpot AT CLECO DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:39:15 -0600
it this FYI -- We're currently on 7.2.x (not sure of the incremental rev, since we're running Sun's EBS, build 494), and it still divides up Netware volumes (only). To sign off this list, send email
Author: Davina Treiber <Davina.Treiber AT PEEVRO.CO DOT UK>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 21:06:47 +0000
This is not true at all. It's nothing to do with performance or shoe-shining. This behaviour is limited to older unsupported versions of NetWorker or older unsupported versions of application modules
Author: Fazil Saiyed <Fazil.Saiyed AT ANIXTER DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:29:59 -0600
Hello, Please refer to articles in PL at EMC for additional causes. ESG83064 LGTSC05961 LGTSC01672 ESG54409 ESG66043 Thanks Davina Treiber <Davina.Treiber AT PeeVRo.co DOT uk> 03/05/2009 03:06 PM To
Author: Davina Treiber <Davina.Treiber AT PEEVRO.CO DOT UK>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 22:11:44 +0000
I stand corrected. Unfortunately Powerlink doesn't allow me to see the full text of any of these references, I can only see part of the description, so I cannot really see what they are about. Isn't