Author: Ian G Batten <ian.batten AT UK.FUJITSU DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:06:48 +0000
I'm backing up four streams of small files from a four-way Fujitsu PW450 (equivalent to roughly a Sun V440) with a pair of DotHill SanNet II arrays running ZFS. The storage node is a Sun V240 with an
Author: Fazil Saiyed <Fazil.Saiyed AT ANIXTER DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:49:48 -0600
Hello, If you were to eliminate hardware bottlenecks, i wonder if using compression directive might improve backup performance ? Are you using AFTD atall, if not perhaps a VTL or AFTD may also be wor
Author: Ian G Batten <ian.batten AT UK.FUJITSU DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:36:21 +0000
Hello, If you were to eliminate hardware bottlenecks, i wonder if using compression directive might improve backup performance ? That's an interesting point. We're using zfs compression, which is ob
I see between 95 and 105MB/sec to my LTO3 Drives. That is staging savesets from AFTD devices which are on disk presented to the Backup Server via FC SAN to a SCSI attached LTO3 Library. OS is Windows
Author: Peter Viertel <Peter.Viertel AT MACQUARIE DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:09:47 +1100
You should be able to get more performance out of the drive - 50MB/sec suggests your drive is not running at the fastest spindle speed given that you are sending uncompressed data to it - maybe the