Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+TL891\:\s+tz89\s+or\s+DLT7000\?\s+\+\s+Capacity\s+problem\s+$NW\s+6\.\s+\*\s+on\s+NT$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+TL891\:\s+tz89\s+or\s+DLT7000\?\s+\+\s+Capacity\s+problem\s+$NW\s+6\.\s+\*\s+on\s+NT$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Networker] TL891: tz89 or DLT7000? + Capacity problem (NW 6. * on NT) (score: 1): Author: "Thomas, Calvin" <calvin.thomas AT NACALOGISTICS DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 09:33:50 -0800; A TZ89 is a dlt7000. The TZ89 is what Dec used to call the DLT7000. Use either one interchangably. Your tape size is 35GB. When you get 36-37GB, you are getting mostly software compression before the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-01/msg00397.html (14,000 bytes)
2. Re: [Networker] TL891: tz89 or DLT7000? + Capacity problem (NW 6. * on NT) (score: 1): Author: Davina Treiber <treiber AT HOTPOP DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:44:34 -0500; Not quite. Although they are the same, NetWorker treats them differently in terms of block size. DLT 7000 uses a default block size of 128KB whereas tz89 uses 256 KB. Why, I know not. So mixing tz89; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-01/msg00398.html (11,932 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] TL891: tz89 or DLT7000? + Capacity problem (NW 6. * on NT) (score: 1): Author: Tim Mooney <mooney AT DOGBERT.CC.NDSU.NODAK DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:48:04 -0600; In regard to: Re: [Networker] TL891: tz89 or DLT7000? + Capacity problem...: I don't believe this is correct. As I recall from a conversation with Compaq and Legato engineers long ago, the tz89 uses; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2003-01/msg00399.html (12,222 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]