Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Storage\s+Nodes\s+on\s+same\s+Library\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Storage\s+Nodes\s+on\s+same\s+Library\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] Storage Nodes on same Library? (score: 1): Author: Jim Allison <jim.allison AT ASURION DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:38:58 -0400; Hey folks, I have a few questions about storage node configuration. I am new to this shop and we are using a configuration that I am unfamiliar with. We are running 7.4.2 on Windows 2003 servers. Lib; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00265.html (12,785 bytes)
2. Re: [Networker] Storage Nodes on same Library? (score: 1): Author: Fazil Saiyed <Fazil.Saiyed AT ANIXTER DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:10:24 -0500; Hello, The usual way of sharing the lib is actually via sharing drives ( needs DDS licences), control lun should be owned and assigned to master server, please check jbconfig man page or use Gui to c; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00267.html (14,733 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] Storage Nodes on same Library? (score: 1): Author: Bruce Breidall <Bruce.Breidall AT CONCUR DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:50:32 -0700; Also, you have to decide whether or not you want the SNs to be dedicated to themselves or not. To be non-dedicated requires another (more expensive) license. You get prompted for that choice when you; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00269.html (16,365 bytes)
4. Re: [Networker] Storage Nodes on same Library? (score: 1): Author: "Allison, Jim" <Jim.Allison AT ASURION DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:25:01 -0500; Thanks guys, We do have all the DDS and SN licenses we need. I am painfully aware of the issues surrounding DDS and dedicated Storage Nodes. I had to script cron jobs around the backup times of lanle; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00274.html (18,365 bytes)
5. Re: [Networker] Storage Nodes on same Library? (score: 1): Author: "Browning, David" <DBrown AT LSUHSC DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:27:15 -0500; Jim, We have 2 T950 libraries, and use both Storage nodes, and Dedicated Storage nodes. In our setup, our large (2TB+) SQL servers are dedicated storage nodes, and backup their own SQL databases. Aft; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00275.html (14,442 bytes)
6. Re: [Networker] Storage Nodes on same Library? (score: 1): Author: Bruce Breidall <Bruce.Breidall AT CONCUR DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:33:54 -0700; I have no experience with ACSLS and Legato, but plenty with other products. As you mentioned, ACS can be partitioned to look like separate libraries, and they are configured a separate libs in NW wit; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00276.html (19,445 bytes)
7. Re: [Networker] Storage Nodes on same Library? (score: 1): Author: Francis Swasey <Frank.Swasey AT UVM DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:41:50 -0400; Hey, I run with a similar configuration... A Qualstar XLS with 12 LTO4 fibre tape drives. Only the nsr server has access to the control port and each of the storage nodes has it's tape drives but NO; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00277.html (14,366 bytes)
8. Re: [Networker] Storage Nodes on same Library? (score: 1): Author: "Allison, Jim" <Jim.Allison AT ASURION DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:32:39 -0500; Thanks all. We have it working. The Networker software on the SN was not 7.4.2 and getting the versions matched appears to have fixed the problem. I was pretty sure intially that the control port was; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00283.html (15,597 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]