Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+StorFirst\s+Altus\-CBRM\s+replacement\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+StorFirst\s+Altus\-CBRM\s+replacement\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] StorFirst Altus-CBRM replacement? (score: 1): Author: bruenger <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 09:11:50 -0400; Hi Phil, We are currently replicating our production Centera environment with Altus to a CentricStor VTL. Seven Ten worked closely with the manufacturer (Fujitsu Siemens Computers) to certify and sup; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-07/msg00004.html (11,695 bytes)
2. [Networker] StorFirst Altus-CBRM replacement? (score: 1): Author: Phil Myers <PMyers2 AT CONEMAUGH DOT ORG>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:20:27 -0400; Hi, group. Have any of you had any experience with the StorFirst Altus by Seven10? We looked at a demo today and it seems promising as a replacement for the Centera Backup & Recovery Module, with whi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00308.html (12,299 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] StorFirst Altus-CBRM replacement? (score: 1): Author: Matthew Huff <mhuff AT OX DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:35:30 -0400; Please let me know what you find out. I have opened case after case with EMC. The CBRM module works, but has such bad performace (I've worked with EMC many times to optimize it, still it's dog slow).; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00311.html (13,955 bytes)
4. Re: [Networker] StorFirst Altus-CBRM replacement? (score: 1): Author: Phil Myers <PMyers2 AT CONEMAUGH DOT ORG>; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:51:17 -0400; Well, the demo showed us that this product may not make backups any faster, but it seems that it may make the backups much more reliable. It uses the Centera's api to replicate c-clips in their nativ; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00317.html (16,056 bytes)
5. Re: [Networker] StorFirst Altus-CBRM replacement? (score: 1): Author: "Davis, Raymond P" <Raymond.P.Davis AT QUESTDIAGNOSTICS DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:13:57 -0400; Phil, We had the product but had many problems with it. We still use the Copan library as a VTL which works great but we removed the Altus piece. I can include my coworker for more details if you lik; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00319.html (15,915 bytes)
6. Re: [Networker] StorFirst Altus-CBRM replacement? (score: 1): Author: "Davis, Raymond P" <Raymond.P.Davis AT QUESTDIAGNOSTICS DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:15:26 -0400; Phil, We had the product but had many problems with it. We still use the Copan library as a VTL which works great but we removed the Altus piece. I can include my coworker for more details if you lik; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00320.html (14,241 bytes)
7. Re: [Networker] StorFirst Altus-CBRM replacement? (score: 1): Author: Phil Myers <PMyers2 AT CONEMAUGH DOT ORG>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:57:38 -0400; Ray, Please do; I would appreciate any info, good or bad, on this product. Thanks Phil Phil, We had the product but had many problems with it. We still use the Copan library as a VTL which works grea; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00335.html (16,657 bytes)
8. [Networker] StorFirst Altus-CBRM replacement? (score: 1): Author: Ingo S <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:47:40 -0400; Hello Phil, We are an authorized EMC reseller in Germany and we provide customers with hardware and software for Enterprise-class archive solutions. We support solutions based on Centera-to-Centera r; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00427.html (12,584 bytes)
9. [Networker] StorFirst Altus-CBRM replacement? (score: 1): Author: RileyTS <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:04:30 -0400; Hello Phil, We initially were sold a Centera with a CASBAR DR bundle that EMC was never able to make work for us. After extensive research and many wrong paths we came across the 710 solution from ou; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2008-06/msg00429.html (12,802 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]