Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Scanner\s+\-i\s+failure\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] Scanner -i failure (score: 1)
Author: Terry Stevens <topspinna AT YAHOO.CO DOT UK>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:13:15 -0400
Hi, We're trying to restore data from tapes that have passed their retention policy. We have a Networker 7.2 Server. We know that six tapes hold the data we need. So I thought the best way to recover
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2006-10/msg00091.html (12,137 bytes)

2. Re: [Networker] Scanner -i failure (score: 1)
Author: Darren Dunham <ddunham AT TAOS DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 08:24:05 -0700
Unless the tape has actually be relabled, that shouldn't matter. Any reason you can't use nsrck -L7 for the client and relevant date to simply recover the old indexes rather than rebuilding them fro
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2006-10/msg00092.html (12,365 bytes)

3. Re: [Networker] Scanner -i failure (score: 1)
Author: Terry Stevens <topspinna AT YAHOO.CO DOT UK>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:37:51 -0400
Cheers for the feedback Darren. I was thinking of using something like - nsrck -L7 -t "01/05/05" <clientname>. But thought that probably wouldn't work because the Networker server would not have a re
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2006-10/msg00093.html (11,505 bytes)

4. Re: [Networker] Scanner -i failure (score: 1)
Author: Martin Hodgson <topspinna AT YAHOO.CO DOT UK>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 06:07:40 -0400
Cheers for the update Darren. The volumes with the indexes must have been there o.k. because after I went for the nsrck -L7 -t <time> <clientname> it brought back the savesets o.k. <Darren Durnam> We
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2006-10/msg00101.html (11,594 bytes)

5. Re: [Networker] Scanner -i failure (score: 1)
Author: Darren Dunham <ddunham AT TAOS DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:48:04 -0700
Hey, always good when that works. I've no good information about why 'scanner -i' didn't appear to do the job for you. -- Darren Dunham ddunham AT taos DOT com Senior Technical Consultant TAOS http:
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2006-10/msg00107.html (11,924 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu