Author: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 19:57:56 -0500
Curious here. Let's suppose I have a save set instance that's 10 GB. If I recover the whole thing versus, say, a specific pathname, will they both take the same time, assuming I let the recover in bo
By pathname, I assume you mean a specific file? The file will take much less time. Why wouldn't you be sure? , you'd wanna Nope, the information available is considerably more granular than per-save
Author: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:27:17 -0500
I wasn't clear. By pathname, I meant a directory. I thought all our data was multiplexed since we have the target sessions set to 5 for all drives. In the case of directories, I've seen it come back
Author: Tim Mooney <mooney AT DOGBERT.CC.NDSU.NODAK DOT EDU>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 19:13:36 -0600
In regard to: [Networker] Recovering a whole saveset versus a piece?,...: Curious here. Let's suppose I have a save set instance that's 10 GB. If I recover the whole thing versus, say, a specific pat
Ah. I believe all it will do is just enumerate the contents of the directory immediately (it has the list of files in the index), then select each file for restoration. The data may be multiplexed,