Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Rant\s+about\s+7\.3\.3\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Rant\s+about\s+7\.3\.3\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] Rant about 7.3.3 (score: 1): Author: Oscar Olsson <spam1 AT QBRANCH DOT SE>; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 13:18:42 +0200; OK, so EMC/Legato has done it once again. Most of you know what I'm talking about, and those of you who don't, here's the story: Once again they have released a version of networker that is completel; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2007-09/msg00000.html (13,413 bytes)
2. Re: [Networker] Rant about 7.3.3 (score: 1): Author: "Willeat, Todd" <willt7 AT STLO.MERCY DOT NET>; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 07:45:00 -0500; I believe in the "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" philosophy. Find a version that works for you and stick with it. I'm still running 7.1.3 with no plans to upgrade... Todd A. Willeat Senior Storage; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2007-09/msg00001.html (15,460 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] Rant about 7.3.3 (score: 1): Author: Stan Horwitz <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 12:33:59 -0400; OK, so EMC/Legato has done it once again. Most of you know what I'm talking about, and those of you who don't, here's the story: Once again they have released a version of networker that is completel; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2007-09/msg00002.html (14,264 bytes)
4. Re: [Networker] Rant about 7.3.3 (score: 1): Author: Oscar Olsson <spam1 AT QBRANCH DOT SE>; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 19:19:06 +0200; On 2007-09-01 12:33, Stan Horwitz revealed: Sun V440 (plus a few storage nodes), Solaris 10 SPARC, Spectra T950 library (still with SAIT-1 drives). //Oscar To sign off this list, send email to listse; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2007-09/msg00003.html (12,682 bytes)
5. Re: [Networker] Rant about 7.3.3 (score: 1): Author: Davina Treiber <Davina.Treiber AT PEEVRO.CO DOT UK>; Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:38:47 +0100; But releasing a minor bugfix version with new bugs like this one sure makes you wonder if they have any quality control at all. That's the thing. You think it is a minor bugfix version because back; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2007-09/msg00010.html (13,415 bytes)
6. Re: [Networker] Rant about 7.3.3 (score: 1): Author: Stan Horwitz <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 07:35:20 -0400; On 2007-09-01 12:33, Stan Horwitz revealed: SH> I am sorry to hear about all the grief you're experiencing with NetWorker configuration Sun V440 (plus a few storage nodes), Solaris 10 SPARC, Spectra; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2007-09/msg00013.html (13,944 bytes)
7. Re: [Networker] Rant about 7.3.3 (score: 1): Author: Teresa Biehler <tpbsys AT RIT DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 08:57:24 -0400; In theory, I agree with this. How do you handle new clients? We're having issues with: - Security advisories that recommend upgrading to v7.2.2Jumbo with hotfix or the "fixed" v7.3x/v7.4 versions - C; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2007-09/msg00015.html (14,404 bytes)
8. Re: [Networker] Rant about 7.3.3 (score: 1): Author: Kevin Malone <kcmalone AT SALISBURY DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 09:07:43 -0400; The one good thing about networker....you can continue to use the server version you have and upgrade your clients to whatever version you need to support the OS you need to backup. I have personally; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2007-09/msg00016.html (15,998 bytes)
9. Re: [Networker] Rant about 7.3.3 (score: 1): Author: Teresa Biehler <tpbsys AT RIT DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 09:14:52 -0400; Yes, but if you have a problem with any of these clients and contact EMC, your configuration is not supported. Per EMC, the client versions need to be lower or equal to the version on the server. I h; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2007-09/msg00017.html (17,330 bytes)
10. Re: [Networker] Rant about 7.3.3 (score: 1): Author: "Coty, Edward" <Edward.Coty AT AIG DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 09:34:19 -0400; I have actually had our PSAM verify that they will support a client running 7.3 for ZFS support with a 7.1 and 7.2 server versions. EDWARD COTY LEAD STORAGE ENGINEER, LCNA WORK - 973-533-2098 CELL -; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2007-09/msg00018.html (18,520 bytes)
11. Re: [Networker] Rant about 7.3.3 (score: 1): Author: Teresa Biehler <tpbsys AT RIT DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:05:29 -0400; Strange - I specifically opened a call about ZFS support. I was told that not only would it not be supported, but that it wouldn't function correctly unless both server and client were at v7.3. Have; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2007-09/msg00019.html (18,976 bytes)
12. Re: [Networker] Rant about 7.3.3 (score: 1): Author: "Coty, Edward" <Edward.Coty AT AIG DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:54:49 -0400; I have a 7.1.3 and a 7.2.2 server. We installed 7.3.2 client on Solaris with ZFS. I was able to successfully backup and restore to both with no problem. See email thread below on EMC's response to su; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2007-09/msg00020.html (21,332 bytes)
13. Re: [Networker] Rant about 7.3.3 (score: 1): Author: Mattias Ahnberg <mattias AT AHNBERG.PP DOT SE>; Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 22:35:55 +0200; Problem is that in a big(ish) environment you always end up with some minor issues that bother you for a customer, and you need to solve it. Instead of trying to assist you with the release you are c; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2007-09/msg00024.html (12,950 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]