Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Odd\s+licensing\s+issue\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Odd\s+licensing\s+issue\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] Odd licensing issue (score: 1): Author: MIchael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:02:50 -0400; I have an odd problem. I have a MS SQL cluster resource that seems to be grabbing a regular client license, instead of a license for a SQL Module, and I don't understand why. 12116:nsrlic: License Su; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-06/msg00097.html (12,677 bytes)
2. Re: [Networker] Odd licensing issue (score: 1): Author: "Goslin, Paul" <pgoslin AT CINCOM DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:02:38 -0400; This makes perfect sense to me.... One std client license is needed to backup the client itself (filesystem). And One MS-SQL license is needed to backup the SQL databases. = 2 licenses used - one for; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-06/msg00099.html (14,383 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] Odd licensing issue (score: 1): Author: MIchael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:22:02 -0400; EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU> wrote on 06/15/2010 02:02:38 PM: The weird thing? Only one of those cluster resources is taking up a regular client license - the other; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-06/msg00100.html (12,643 bytes)
4. [Networker] Odd licensing issue (score: 1): Author: wallace88 <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:35:42 -0400; Starting with, i think, 7.4.2, if both the NetWorker server and clients are the same version or higher, then it does not use cluster licenses anymore. Instead it uses only client connected licenses.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-06/msg00108.html (12,339 bytes)
5. Re: [Networker] Odd licensing issue (score: 1): Author: "Terveen, Frank" <Frank.Terveen AT AFM DOT NL>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 05:58:06 +0200; Yes Wallace I have seen the same use of licenses with our sql, exchange and fileserver cluster. met vriendelijke groeten / With kind regards Frank Terveen -- Sent via BB -- Oorspronkelijk bericht --; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-06/msg00109.html (14,060 bytes)
6. Re: [Networker] Odd licensing issue (score: 1): Author: MIchael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:35:37 -0400; EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU> wrote on 06/15/2010 08:35:42 PM: In my case, all my SQL clusters are also storage nodes (AFTD devices), and since all storage nodes mus; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-06/msg00111.html (13,006 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]