Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Limitation\s+on\s+bar\s+code\s+label\s+length\s+and\s+special\s+chars\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Limitation\s+on\s+bar\s+code\s+label\s+length\s+and\s+special\s+chars\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] Limitation on bar code label length and special chars? (score: 1): Author: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:42:51 -0500; Hi, I have two questions on bar codes. We have some non bar code labels that we use on our LTO and SDLT tapes that contain special characters like '.' and '_' (underscores). For example: full.## (8 c; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-01/msg00259.html (12,987 bytes)
2. Re: [Networker] Limitation on bar code label length and special chars? (score: 1): Author: Stan Horwitz <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:18:05 -0500; I don't use an ATL library, or STK, but on the two libraries I do use, the documentation contains very detailed information about how bar coded labels should be printed. I suggest you check the manua; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-01/msg00261.html (12,445 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] Limitation on bar code label length and special chars? (score: 1): Author: "robert.maiello AT thomson DOT com" <robert.maiello AT THOMSON DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:22:55 -0500; The Quantum/ATL M1500 we just got came with barcodes that had 8 characters. The ATL barcodes should be pretty standard although I forget if the standard is 3of9 or something like that. Robert Maiello; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2004-01/msg00272.html (13,472 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]