Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+LTO\-3\s+$go\s+with\s+IBM\s+or\s+HP\?$\s+hitting\s+from\s+Windows2k3\s+over\s+the\s+SAN\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+LTO\-3\s+$go\s+with\s+IBM\s+or\s+HP\?$\s+hitting\s+from\s+Windows2k3\s+over\s+the\s+SAN\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] LTO-3 (go with IBM or HP?) hitting from Windows2k3 over the SAN (score: 1): Author: "Ballinger, John M" <john.ballinger AT PNL DOT GOV>; Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:40:00 -0800; We're about to receive a new ADIC Scalar i2k tape library with LTO-3 drives. What's the word on IBM vs HP LTO-3 drives ? We've had IBM before in the LTO-1's and ..2's Thanks - John To sign off this l; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2006-02/msg00005.html (12,099 bytes)
2. Re: [Networker] LTO-3 (go with IBM or HP?) hitting from Windows2k3 over the SAN (score: 1): Author: Paul Esson <Paul.Esson AT REDSTOR DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 17:15:28 -0500; John, I was not aware ADIC are shipping Scalar i2000's with HP LTO-3 drives yet? I have seen several and each has been IBM, indeed their web site has no HP LTO-3 drive mentioned in the drive comparis; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2006-02/msg00010.html (14,102 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] LTO-3 (go with IBM or HP?) hitting from Windows2k3 over the SAN (score: 1): Author: Tim Mooney <mooney AT DOGBERT.CC.NDSU.NODAK DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 17:25:26 -0600; In regard to: [Networker] LTO-3 (go with IBM or HP?) hitting from...: We're about to receive a new ADIC Scalar i2k tape library with LTO-3 drives. What's the word on IBM vs HP LTO-3 drives ? We're no; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2006-02/msg00015.html (13,476 bytes)
4. Re: [Networker] LTO-3 (go with IBM or HP?) hitting from Windows2k3 over the SAN (score: 1): Author: Dave Mussulman <mussulma AT UIUC DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 17:38:19 -0600; Can you post what you came up with for an HP LTO-3 stinit.def entry? I didn't make any modifications to the file for our drives, so I'm curious what you needed that I'm missing. Dave To sign off this; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2006-02/msg00016.html (12,660 bytes)
5. Re: [Networker] LTO-3 (go with IBM or HP?) hitting from Windows2k3 over the SAN (score: 1): Author: Tim Mooney <mooney AT DOGBERT.CC.NDSU.NODAK DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 17:54:24 -0600; In regard to: Re: [Networker] LTO-3 (go with IBM or HP?) hitting from...: On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:25:26PM -0600, Tim Mooney wrote: HP support was pretty much worthless when STK and I were asking f; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2006-02/msg00017.html (14,946 bytes)
6. [Networker] LTO-3 (go with IBM or HP?) hitting from Windows2k3 over the SAN (score: 1): Author: Fazil Saiyed <fazil.saiyed AT ANIXTER DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 09:13:30 -0500; Hello, You may want to look at the recent issue with CDI flag & i2000\Legato that is published in this coloum, the biggest chalange is getting all this vendors to take ownership of problem if they ar; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2006-02/msg00072.html (12,208 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]