Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Is\s+the\s+\'tapes\'\s+command\s+wrong\s+in\s+7\.5\.x\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Is\s+the\s+\'tapes\'\s+command\s+wrong\s+in\s+7\.5\.x\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] Is the 'tapes' command wrong in 7.5.x? (score: 1): Author: Manel Rodero <manel AT FIB.UPC DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 14:40:40 +0200; Hello, We've recently upgraded to 7.5.3 (from 7.4.4 under W2K8 x64) and we've seen that the 'tapes' command is not reporting our drives as usual. The output is like this: [email protected]:\\.\Tape0 is <; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-09/msg00066.html (14,852 bytes)
2. Re: [Networker] Is the 'tapes' command wrong in 7.5.x? (score: 1): Author: "Albert, Eddie" <eddie.albert AT BANKOFAMERICA DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 09:52:53 -0400; EMC will suggest you upgrade to v7.6+ service pack. /grin Semper fidelis, /ALE Hello, We've recently upgraded to 7.5.3 (from 7.4.4 under W2K8 x64) and we've seen that the 'tapes' command is not repor; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-09/msg00068.html (14,006 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] Is the 'tapes' command wrong in 7.5.x? (score: 1): Author: Thierry Faidherbe <thierry.faidherbe AT FOREM DOT BE>; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 16:10:13 +0200; I have the same behavior after upgrade from NSR741 to 753, from W2K 32b to 2008R2 64b and setting up tape drive persistence naming (using regedit, go to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\ SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\C; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-09/msg00069.html (16,500 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]