Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+How\s+does\s+nsrclone\s+order\s+a\s+list\s+of\s+SSIDs\s+for\s+cloning\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+How\s+does\s+nsrclone\s+order\s+a\s+list\s+of\s+SSIDs\s+for\s+cloning\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] How does nsrclone order a list of SSIDs for cloning? (score: 1): Author: ramkriz <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:43:24 -0500; Hi Brett, I would prefer Staging rather than Cloning. You could do the same using NSR stage instead of NSR clone. I have it configured as below in my server. Once your VTL reaches 80%, it will start; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-01/msg00071.html (14,112 bytes)
2. [Networker] How does nsrclone order a list of SSIDs for cloning? (score: 1): Author: jcmps821 <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:46:02 -0500; I think you can "script" your way around this limitation by .... 1) keep your mminfo command using a redirected output file ... 2) rather than running the nsrclone command once with an input file 3); /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-01/msg00076.html (12,481 bytes)
3. Re: [Networker] How does nsrclone order a list of SSIDs for cloning? (score: 1): Author: Preston de Guise <enterprise.backup AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 06:58:44 +1100; It will work, but it will scatter your clones across every tape drive that can hold a clone volume. Why? When NetWorker finishes a clone operation, the sequence that will occur is: - Clone stops - De; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2010-01/msg00077.html (13,525 bytes)
4. [Networker] How does nsrclone order a list of SSIDs for cloning? (score: 1): Author: bbartick <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:55:58 -0500; We recently rolled out a VTL and I'm in the process of scripting the cloning process. From the testing I've done, it seems as though nsrclone does not clone the SSIDs in the order you pass to the com; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-12/msg00172.html (13,306 bytes)
5. Re: [Networker] How does nsrclone order a list of SSIDs for cloning? (score: 1): Author: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>; Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:18:17 -0500; bbartick wrote: We recently rolled out a VTL and I'm in the process of scripting the cloning process. From the testing I've done, it seems as though nsrclone does not clone the SSIDs in the order you; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-12/msg00173.html (16,843 bytes)
6. Re: [Networker] How does nsrclone order a list of SSIDs for cloning? (score: 1): Author: Preston de Guise <enterprise.backup AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:27:16 +1100; George, Brett, Yes, since NetWorker keeps multiplexing, it needs to re-order any list of received savesets in the best order to preserve interleaving and prevent seeks/rewinds on each piece of media; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-12/msg00174.html (15,823 bytes)
7. Re: [Networker] How does nsrclone order a list of SSIDs for cloning? (score: 1): Author: Len Philpot <Len.Philpot AT CLECO DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:27:43 -0600; I agree. The only time I've seen any improvement of any kind using "per SSID" cloning was in a rare instances where I needed to run two clone jobs simultaneously, reading from tapes where the potent; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-12/msg00175.html (13,535 bytes)
8. [Networker] How does nsrclone order a list of SSIDs for cloning? (score: 1): Author: brerrabbit <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:27:39 -0500; I don't believe that this info is publicly available, we've looked into this previously and it wasn't. In fact, we had an Networker resident from EMC on site and he couldn't get the info either. Mayb; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-12/msg00182.html (13,990 bytes)
9. [Networker] How does nsrclone order a list of SSIDs for cloning? (score: 1): Author: bbartick <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:47:34 -0500; My quess is that the internal logic has something to do with minimizing the number of tape changes. It looks like if you are cloning a particular saveset, the system will try and find other savesets; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-12/msg00183.html (14,831 bytes)
10. Re: [Networker] How does nsrclone order a list of SSIDs for cloning? (score: 1): Author: Anacreo <anacreo AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:56:08 -0600; Not really on topic... but maybe this workflow will help you in your flow design... With our VTL I've switched all of our backups (except for database) to 1 monthly full (last weekend of the month) a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-12/msg00186.html (23,867 bytes)
11. [Networker] How does nsrclone order a list of SSIDs for cloning? (score: 1): Author: jbrissenden <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:02:34 -0500; What a pain huh? I believe you're right, you don't have the control over the ssid order when you issue nsrclone with a file. But I think if you say savetime < 21 days ago in your mminfo, the first ru; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-12/msg00188.html (14,609 bytes)
12. Re: [Networker] How does nsrclone order a list of SSIDs for cloning? (score: 1): Author: A Darren Dunham <ddunham AT TAOS DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:55:04 +0000; Smaller savetimes are older. '0' is 1970, '1000000000' is 2001. So a date smaller than a particular date is also older than that date. -- Darren To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT lists; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2009-12/msg00189.html (12,828 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]