Author: Marco Esser <marco.esser.me AT BAYER-AG DOT DE>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 11:50:05 -0500
Hello All, I´m using NetWorker 6.1.2.Build.340 Network/15 on WindowsNT4.0. Now we became a new W2K-Cluster to Backup. And I´ve some trouble with it: The browse and retentionpolicy for the daily backu
Author: Dirk Verhoeff <dirk.verhoeff AT NL.ABNAMRO DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 09:46:37 +0100
Hi, I haven't seen a response to this, so let me fill the gap. Check with mminfo what is on the tapes that gets a retention time of three years. My bet is that it's the indexes of the clients. If tha
Author: "VERHAEGHE Koen (BMB)" <Koen.VERHAEGHE AT PROXIMUS DOT NET>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 12:29:42 +0100
Marco, Not sure if this would help or is already the case. Are you storing the indexes to the virtual client name i.e. do you have defined in the save -c <virtual client> for your clustered save sets
Author: Marco Esser <marco.esser.me AT BAYER-AG DOT DE>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 10:04:28 -0500
Hello Mr Verhoeff, Thank you for your reply ! You´ve lost your bet ;-) We have an extra-Pool for indexes and bootstraps, so this is not the Problem. I have verified it a view minutes ago, no index on
Author: Marco Esser <marco.esser.me AT BAYER-AG DOT DE>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 10:16:34 -0500
Hello Koen, i´m not sure, to understand you right. But I´ve an etra-index with the virtual client name witch grows after each save. But I did not remenber to configure this anywhere. I habe configure