Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Effect\s+on\s+incremental\s+if\s+clone\s+remains\s+but\s+original\s+removed\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Effect\s+on\s+incremental\s+if\s+clone\s+remains\s+but\s+original\s+removed\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] Effect on incremental if clone remains but original removed? (score: 1): Author: George Sinclair <george.sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>; Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:28:04 -0400; Hi, Please excuse the long winded question, but I want to be clear on what I'm asking. Question here about whether or not a clone save set that remains in the media database will affect a subsequent; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2012-08/msg00003.html (15,612 bytes)
2. [Networker] Effect on incremental if clone remains but original removed? (score: 1): Author: bingo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 04:20:47 -0700; I have not read through all your text because in my eyes, it is not necessary. Your core question is stated in the headline. And the answer is: it does not matter which instance (original or clone) i; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2012-08/msg00017.html (11,718 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]