Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Can\s+a\s+numeric\s+backup\s+be\s+the\s+oldest\s+browsable\s+instance\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Can\s+a\s+numeric\s+backup\s+be\s+the\s+oldest\s+browsable\s+instance\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Networker] Can a numeric backup be the oldest browsable instance? (score: 1): Author: George Sinclair <george.sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>; Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:36:34 -0400; Is it possible that a numeric backup could still be browsable (sumflags=cb) but none of the older instances of that save set? In other words, the preceding incrementals are 'cr' and the previous full; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2012-04/msg00099.html (12,320 bytes)
2. Re: [Networker] Can a numeric backup be the oldest browsable instance? (score: 1): Author: Tim Mooney <Tim.Mooney AT NDSU DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:26:13 -0500; In regard to: [Networker] Can a numeric backup be the oldest browsable...: Is it possible that a numeric backup could still be browsable (sumflags=cb) but none of the older instances of that save set; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2012-04/msg00101.html (12,413 bytes)
3. [Networker] Can a numeric backup be the oldest browsable instance? (score: 1): Author: bingo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:17:04 -0700; I think you have a typo in your statement: "In other words, the preceding incrementals are 'cr' and the previous full is also 'cr'?" should obviously read: "In other words, the preceding incrementals; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2012-04/msg00105.html (12,355 bytes)
4. Re: [Networker] Can a numeric backup be the oldest browsable instance? (score: 1): Author: George Sinclair <george.sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>; Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:58:00 -0400; "In other words, the preceding incrementals are 'cr' and the previous full is also 'cr'?" should obviously read: "In other words, the preceding incrementals are 'cb' and the previous full is 'cr'?" -; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2012-04/msg00106.html (15,192 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]