Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+question\s+on\s+re\-running\s+of\s+failed\s+levels\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+question\s+on\s+re\-running\s+of\s+failed\s+levels\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] question on re-running of failed levels (score: 1): Author: Thomas Lohman <thomasl AT mtl.mit DOT edu>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:19:29 -0400; Before I submit this as a possible bug, I just wanted to see if perhaps it is the expected behavior for Bacula. We have a few long running jobs that take > 24 hours to do a Full backup. Because of th; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2012-04/msg00216.html (12,271 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]