Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+force\s+backup\s+of\s+unchanged\s+file\s+in\s+incremental\s+backup\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] force backup of unchanged file in incremental backup (score: 1)
Author: "James Harper" <james.harper AT bendigoit.com DOT au>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:33:14 +1000
The "last modified" datestamp on MSSQL database files doesn't get changed unless the actual file dimensions change (eg it 'grows') or when the file is closed. This means that an incremental backup wo
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-04/msg00195.html (13,396 bytes)

2. Re: [Bacula-users] force backup of unchanged file in incremental backup (score: 1)
Author: Christian Manal <moenoel AT informatik.uni-bremen DOT de>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:54:09 +0200
Am 14.04.2011 08:33, schrieb James Harper: Hi, does the file change at all? If so, you can just adjust the metadata that Accurate uses to compare checksums. That is done in the fileset: http://bacula
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-04/msg00200.html (14,253 bytes)

3. Re: [Bacula-users] force backup of unchanged file in incremental backup (score: 1)
Author: Jérôme Blion <jerome.blion AT free DOT fr>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:24:18 +0200
when an http://bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Configuring_Director.html#8553 Hello, AFAIK, you should never backup MSSQL databases when they are running. If you do so, the database will try to
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-04/msg00202.html (15,591 bytes)

4. Re: [Bacula-users] force backup of unchanged file in incremental backup (score: 1)
Author: Guy <guy AT britewhite DOT net>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:07:03 +0100
If this is a Linux system just use "touch" to update the timestamps on the file --Guy (via iPhone) On 14 Apr 2011, at 08:54, Christian Manal <moenoel AT informatik.uni-bremen DOT -- Benefiting from S
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-04/msg00203.html (15,956 bytes)

5. Re: [Bacula-users] force backup of unchanged file in incremental backup (score: 1)
Author: "James Harper" <james.harper AT bendigoit.com DOT au>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:53:58 +1000
when during an http://bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Configuring_Director.html#8 553 Yes the file changes, so an md5 hash will be sufficient. The databases are only a few hundred MB so the co
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-04/msg00205.html (15,464 bytes)

6. Re: [Bacula-users] force backup of unchanged file in incremental backup (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Mueller <thomas AT chaschperli DOT ch>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:37:35 +0000 (UTC)
Am Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:33:14 +1000 schrieb James Harper: you could create a backup job with just that file in it and run it always as full. - Thomas -- Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond I
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-04/msg00208.html (14,251 bytes)

7. Re: [Bacula-users] force backup of unchanged file in incremental backup (score: 1)
Author: Jérôme Blion <jerome.blion AT free DOT fr>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:21:15 +0200
when an always I think his goal is to recreate some differential backups for MSSQL (RMAN provides it for Oracle). To do that, he needs to know which datafiles moved... If you perform a touch on each
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-04/msg00210.html (14,916 bytes)

8. Re: [Bacula-users] force backup of unchanged file in incremental backup (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Mueller <thomas AT chaschperli DOT ch>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:28:53 +0200
you can't do a Differential or Incremental backup of MSSQL data files. this would require a FD plugin or another tool. yes, MSSQL provides a VSS "Plugin". so MSSQL knows when it has to flush to disk
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-04/msg00211.html (14,566 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu