Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+bad\s+file\s+dates\s+cause\s+incremental\s+backups\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] bad file dates cause incremental backups (score: 1)
Author: Mark Nienberg <gmane AT tippingmar DOT com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 09:54:25 -0700
I have a bunch of files on a file server that have dates in the future like 3/28/2025. These are mostly image files downloaded from a digital camera that probably had the date set incorrectly. I noti
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-05/msg00201.html (12,340 bytes)

2. Re: [Bacula-users] bad file dates cause incremental backups (score: 1)
Author: "Fahrer, Julian" <julian AT fahrer DOT net>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 21:12:56 +0200
As far as I know, this is by design. Bacula chooses the files to be backed up in an incremental run by the date of the file. --Ursprüngliche Nachricht-- Von: Mark Nienberg [mailto:gmane AT tippingmar
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-05/msg00205.html (13,605 bytes)

3. Re: [Bacula-users] bad file dates cause incremental backups (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Keane <subscription AT kkeane DOT com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:29:13 -0700
Easy solution: use "touch" to fix the file date. Or wait 15 years and ten months and the problem will go away by itself. -- Kevin Keane Owner The NetTech Find the Uncommon: Expert Solutions for a Net
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-05/msg00207.html (13,135 bytes)

4. Re: [Bacula-users] bad file dates cause incremental backups (score: 1)
Author: Graham Keeling <graham AT equiinet DOT com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 08:40:24 +0100
Have you tried the 'accurate' backup option? -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kod
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-05/msg00213.html (12,551 bytes)

5. Re: [Bacula-users] bad file dates cause incremental backups (score: 1)
Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 08:27:16 -0400
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:27 AM, John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com> wrote: -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-05/msg00224.html (13,207 bytes)

6. Re: [Bacula-users] bad file dates cause incremental backups (score: 1)
Author: Mark Nienberg <gmane AT tippingmar DOT com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 09:39:41 -0700
Yes, I am in the process of doing the touch thing. But the fact that these files get backed up makes me thing something is a little bit wrong with the algorithm that determines incrementals. Anyway,
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-05/msg00230.html (12,472 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu