Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+bacula\-dir\s+needs\s+growing\s+amount\s+of\s+memory\s+when\s+stuck\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+bacula\-dir\s+needs\s+growing\s+amount\s+of\s+memory\s+when\s+stuck\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] bacula-dir needs growing amount of memory when stuck (score: 1): Author: Andreas Thienemann <andreas AT bawue DOT net>; Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:10:37 +0200 (CEST); We have a bacula-dir system which is waiting for manual intervention for some days time now. Due to technical problems with the tape drive, the problem will be with us for a few more days. Memory con; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-04/msg00397.html (13,269 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-dir needs growing amount of memory when stuck (score: 1): Author: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>; Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:30:27 -0400; Could this be the spooled attributes taking up memory? Is the value increasing as time goes on? - -- Dan Langille BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference : http://www.bsdcan.org/ PGCon - The PostgreSQL; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-04/msg00429.html (14,222 bytes)
3. Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-dir needs growing amount of memory when stuck (score: 1): Author: Andreas Thienemann <andreas AT bawue DOT net>; Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:23:17 +0200 (CEST); Might be attributes. But the jobs are all blocked waiting for either Max Storage Jobs or similar. Even though there are 230 jobs waiting in the queue, no new attributes should be spooled, right? So w; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-04/msg00474.html (13,522 bytes)
4. Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-dir needs growing amount of memory when stuck (score: 1): Author: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>; Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:02:35 -0400; I no longer see the original detail, but I suspect there is one job running, and it has spooled attributes waiting to be written. That is y theory. Correct. Which is why I asked the "increasing" ques; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-04/msg00476.html (14,542 bytes)
5. Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-dir needs growing amount of memory when stuck (score: 1): Author: Andreas Thienemann <andreas AT bawue DOT net>; Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:03:50 +0200 (CEST); Running Jobs: Writing: Incremental Backup job analytics.2009-04-11_23 JobId=1229 Volume="" pool="Default" device="Drive-1" (/dev/nst1) spooling=0 despooling=0 despool_wait=0 Files=0 Bytes=0 Bytes/sec; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-04/msg00483.html (14,840 bytes)
6. Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-dir needs growing amount of memory when stuck (score: 1): Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:04:56 -0400; On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Andreas Thienemann <andreas AT bawue DOT net> wrote: Well 2 drives are blocked because you have no appendable or usable media. Any idea on how long it has been waitin; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-04/msg00484.html (15,303 bytes)
7. Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-dir needs growing amount of memory when stuck (score: 1): Author: Andreas Thienemann <andreas AT bawue DOT net>; Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:19:49 +0200 (CEST); Just to clarify. Yes, I know it's blocked. No, I'm not going to unblock it before certain scsi erros are fixed, it's useless writing to tapes when after 5G a scsi error happens and the tape is marked; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-04/msg00485.html (13,956 bytes)
8. Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-dir needs growing amount of memory when stuck (score: 1): Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:55:58 -0400; When I replied I did think of that. That is quite excessive, I was thinking thousands of messages but enough to equal 2.6GB would be way too many.. John -- Stay on top of everything new and differen; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-04/msg00486.html (14,246 bytes)
9. Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-dir needs growing amount of memory when stuck (score: 1): Author: Andreas Thienemann <andreas AT bawue DOT net>; Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 23:03:13 +0200 (CEST); Exactly my thoughts. That would be excessive. I'm sure that bacula is keeping some state in memory and it's growing... But it shouldn't be that much IMHO. regards, andreas -- Stay on top of everythin; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-04/msg00487.html (13,783 bytes)
10. Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-dir needs growing amount of memory when stuck (score: 1): Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:50:13 -0400; On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Andreas Thienemann <andreas AT bawue DOT net> wrote: This is probably a bug caused by a condition that is not tested by the developers very often if ever. I mean 230; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-04/msg00488.html (14,260 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]