Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Ubuntu\s+10\.10\s+Install\s+Script\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Ubuntu\s+10\.10\s+Install\s+Script\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Bacula-users] Ubuntu 10.10 Install Script (score: 1): Author: Craig Van Tassle <cvantassle AT purdue DOT edu>; Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 11:20:12 -0400; Try apt-get install bacula-common-pgsql bacula-sd-pgsql bacula-director-pgsql That will allow you to install Bacula with Posgres support built in. I've been using Bacula on 10.10 for a couple of mont; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-07/msg00020.html (13,235 bytes)
2. [Bacula-users] Ubuntu 10.10 Install Script (score: 1): Author: Mehma Sarja <mehmasarja AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:04:34 -0700; Dear bacul-ors and bacula-rettes, I submit to you an updated Ubuntu 10.10 install script which works for me on a 64 bit machine. Bacula 5.0.3 on Ubuntu 10.10 server - Jun 2011 *NOTE: The following in; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-06/msg00449.html (14,475 bytes)
3. Re: [Bacula-users] Ubuntu 10.10 Install Script (score: 1): Author: Konstantin Khomoutov <flatworm AT users.sourceforge DOT net>; Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 01:34:14 +0400; [...] What's wrong with `aptitude install bacula`? In case you desperately need 5.0.3 over 5.0.2 from meerkat, what's wrong with backporting a 5.0.3 package from a more recent OS release? -- All of t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-06/msg00455.html (11,926 bytes)
4. Re: [Bacula-users] Ubuntu 10.10 Install Script (score: 1): Author: Mehma Sarja <mehmasarja AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:23:18 -0700; I did not know that existed. But there are a couple of things wrong with apt-get install bacula. The choices are confusing and the hit and miss approach leaves a broken install. apt-get install selec; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-06/msg00457.html (12,947 bytes)
5. Re: [Bacula-users] Ubuntu 10.10 Install Script (score: 1): Author: Venkatesh K Reddy <venkatesh AT kaevee DOT com>; Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 07:39:38 +0530; I did not know that existed. But there are a couple of things wrong with apt-get install bacula. The choices are confusing and the hit and miss approach leaves a broken install. apt-get install selec; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-06/msg00458.html (13,826 bytes)
6. Re: [Bacula-users] Ubuntu 10.10 Install Script (score: 1): Author: Mehma Sarja <mehmasarja AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:13:46 -0700; I like postgres and that's what I kept selecting. Is the apt-get or aptitude convenience that people like or is there an aversion to compiling? It is easy and you have so many configure options to se; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-06/msg00459.html (12,170 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]