Author: "Hayden Katzenellenbogen" <hayden AT nextlevelinternet DOT com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:14:09 -0700
Hello, Thanks to a patch published two weeks ago I am finally making headway into the wonderful world of Bacula. I have a single machine right now with about 1.2T of data I am backing up. When I run
Author: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:12:32 +0100
Are you using software compression (gzip) in Bacula? What do "top" and "iostat 10" show when running a backup? You could try using tar to check the speed of your filesystem, e.g. time tar cf /dev/nu
Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:27:56 -0400
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Martin Simmons<martin AT lispworks DOT com> wrote: Could also be the database. I mean if the db is on the same raid array as the source disk do not expect 70MB/s back
Author: "Hayden Katzenellenbogen" <hayden AT nextlevelinternet DOT com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:25:20 -0700
Martin, I am not using Gzip in Bacula. The drive I have does hardware compression I thought that would be enough for now. I seem to be getting about 1.2T on an 800G LTO4 tape. Here is the iostat outp
Author: "Hayden Katzenellenbogen" <hayden AT nextlevelinternet DOT com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:26:47 -0700
John, For now the DB is on the same raid partition. I our DB admin is building a new high availability pair that I will move it onto soon. The data that I am accessing is local but like you said spoo
Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:50:46 -0400
I use 5G for multi-terabyte backups but I am also running multiple concurrent jobs from different servers at the same time. John -- Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win