Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Speed\s+and\s+integration\s+issues\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Speed and integration issues (score: 1)
Author: David Lee Lambert <davidl AT lmert DOT com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 04:45:56 -0500
I'm trying to use Bacula to do daily backups of data stored in iSCSI LUNs on a NetApp filer, using NetApp snapshots to ensure consistency. The hosts to be backed up have dual Gigabit Ethernet connect
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-12/msg00148.html (15,588 bytes)

2. Re: [Bacula-users] Speed and integration issues (score: 1)
Author: Alex Chekholko <chekh AT pcbi.upenn DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:00:32 -0500
This sounds like some problem outside of bacula. It helps to test all of the components separately: 1) How fast the source can read from disk (probably pretty fast since it's a filer) 2) How fast the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-12/msg00157.html (17,877 bytes)

3. Re: [Bacula-users] Speed and integration issues (score: 1)
Author: Bob Hetzel <beh AT case DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:55:07 -0500
One thing you should make sure if is that your snapshot is read-only and you're not trying to update the access time of the files when you back them up. That has enough CPU power for bacula at LTO-2
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-12/msg00158.html (19,938 bytes)

4. Re: [Bacula-users] Speed and integration issues (score: 1)
Author: Alan Brown <ajb2 AT mssl.ucl.ac DOT uk>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:31:25 +0000 (GMT)
I have had a _lot_ of trouble with 3com Vortex/boomerang/tornado NICs under high load - they tend to start emitting unswitchable packets which splatter the entire network causing slowdowns on all mac
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-12/msg00256.html (12,416 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu