Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Slow\s+Performance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Slow\s+Performance\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Slow Performance (score: 1): Author: Graham Worley <g.worley AT bangor.ac DOT uk>; Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 01:00:51 +0100; Hello, I've just started using Bacula having installed the RPMs from the Scientific Linux distro. I'm trying to back up several machines to disk file on the Bacula server and am experiencing two odd; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2012-05/msg00247.html (12,091 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] Slow Performance (score: 1): Author: Guy <guy AT britewhite DOT net>; Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 13:57:01 +0100; Are you doing compression or encryption? And if so which? If the files are large I found that those can really slow down the transfers. --Guy (via iPhone) Attachment: smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cr; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2012-05/msg00248.html (13,838 bytes)
3. Re: [Bacula-users] Slow Performance (score: 1): Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 10:37:23 -0400; I have seen that in the past like 3 times in 10 years (around 30 thousand completed jobs) but in no way is that is not normal. I would look for an updated version of bacula. 5.26 is the current vers; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2012-05/msg00250.html (12,829 bytes)
4. Re: [Bacula-users] Slow Performance (score: 1): Author: Graham Worley <G.Worley AT bangor.ac DOT uk>; Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 00:53:29 +0100; Am building 5.2.6 by hand now as 5.0.0 was the latest in the Scientific Linux repository. I'll see how I get on. I believe compression is off. Should running multiple jobs help? I'm trying to unders; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2012-05/msg00260.html (14,286 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]