Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Question\s+about\s+bacula\s+and\s+tls\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Question\s+about\s+bacula\s+and\s+tls\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Bacula-users] Question about bacula and tls (score: 1): Author: Ana Emília M. Arruda <emiliaarruda AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:09:08 -0300; Hello Egoitz, Is this thread clear? If you have your own dedicated CA, then take care of her :). This way and having level 4 bacula TLS configured as Josh explained, then your communication will be "; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-10/msg00004.html (22,244 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] Question about bacula and tls (score: 1): Author: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea <egoitz AT ramattack DOT net>; Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 08:47:08 +0200; Good morning mates, Apologies for my very very late response. Just one question for confirming, in Joshs third point, when sais : Level 3: # This level requires encryption and that the certificate pr; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-10/msg00015.html (25,444 bytes)
3. Re: [Bacula-users] Question about bacula and tls (score: 1): Author: Josh Fisher <jfisher AT pvct DOT com>; Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 06:54:46 -0400; On 10/2/2015 2:47 AM, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: Good morning mates, Apologies for my very very late response. Just one question for confirming, in Joshs third point, when sais : Level 3: # This; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-10/msg00017.html (32,798 bytes)
4. [Bacula-users] Question about bacula and tls (score: 1): Author: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea <egoitz AT ramattack DOT net>; Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 15:57:55 +0200; Hi mates, Have been doing some checks with Bacula and TLS. At present I have a TLS enable directive, require tis to yes and the ca certificate public key (of an own CA) copied in the server and the c; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00167.html (13,257 bytes)
5. Re: [Bacula-users] Question about bacula and tls (score: 1): Author: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea <egoitz AT ramattack DOT net>; Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 20:03:36 +0200; Have been taking a look to all this in the source code It seems that TLS Verify Peer basically ends up by doing (look at bold please) : /* * Create a new TLS_CONTEXT instance. * Returns: Pointer to T; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00168.html (21,730 bytes)
6. Re: [Bacula-users] Question about bacula and tls (score: 1): Author: Ana Emília M. Arruda <emiliaarruda AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 16:46:22 -0300; Hello, The TLS enable do not force the use of TLS. For example, if you configure your director with TLS enable = yes and TLS require = no, clients can communicate with your director with or without T; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00169.html (24,698 bytes)
7. Re: [Bacula-users] Question about bacula and tls (score: 1): Author: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea <egoitz AT ramattack DOT net>; Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 23:20:21 +0200; Good night, First of all thanks a lot for your time :) El 28/9/2015, a las 21:46, Ana Emília M. Arruda <emiliaarruda AT gmail DOT com> escribió: Hello, The TLS enable do not force the use of TLS. For; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00170.html (30,149 bytes)
8. Re: [Bacula-users] Question about bacula and tls (score: 1): Author: Ana Emília M. Arruda <emiliaarruda AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 01:24:44 -0300; On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea <egoitz AT ramattack DOT net> wrote: Good night, Good night Egoitz. Sorry for my late reply. First of all thanks a lot for your time :) Thank yo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00178.html (46,264 bytes)
9. Re: [Bacula-users] Question about bacula and tls (score: 1): Author: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea <egoitz AT ramattack DOT net>; Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:18:08 +0200; Hi Ana!! Really thanks for answering my doubts :) I do answer in black below... El 30/9/2015, a las 6:24, Ana Emília M. Arruda <emiliaarruda AT gmail DOT com> escribió: On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 6:20 P; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00179.html (60,641 bytes)
10. Re: [Bacula-users] Question about bacula and tls (score: 1): Author: Josh Fisher <jfisher AT pvct DOT com>; Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:22:45 -0400; On 9/30/2015 3:18 AM, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: Hi Ana!! Really thanks for answering my doubts :) I do answer in black below... El 30/9/2015, a las 6:24, Ana Emília M. Arruda <emiliaarruda AT gmail; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00180.html (22,418 bytes)
11. Re: [Bacula-users] Question about bacula and tls (score: 1): Author: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea <egoitz AT ramattack DOT net>; Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:31:42 +0200; Thank you so much to all of you :) :) El 2 oct 2015, a las 12:54, Josh Fisher <jfisher AT pvct DOT com> escribió: On 10/2/2015 2:47 AM, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: Good morning mates, Apologies for my; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-10/msg00031.html (31,432 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]