Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Priority\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Priority\s+question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Priority question (score: 1): Author: hymie! <hymie AT lactose.homelinux DOT net>; Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 10:26:04 -0400; My bacula setup is improving, and I have you guys to thank for it, so thank you. I have two separate Storage resources, and each one has specific backup jobs assigned to it, and (I think) two jobs wi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-04/msg00052.html (12,089 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] Priority question (score: 1): Author: <ewan.brown AT stfc.ac DOT uk>; Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:26:29 +0000; You are right that no priority 10 jobs will get run while there are higher priority (lower number) jobs running. To run jobs in parallel they need to be the same priority. However, to some extent you; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-04/msg00105.html (13,913 bytes)
3. Re: [Bacula-users] Priority question (score: 1): Author: Rodrigo Renie Braga <rodrigorenie AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 22:07:49 -0300; I guess it would be nice to have priorities separated per Storage... 2011/4/6 <ewan.brown AT stfc.ac DOT uk> You are right that no priority 10 jobs will get run while there are higher priority (lower; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-04/msg00122.html (15,351 bytes)
4. Re: [Bacula-users] Priority question (score: 1): Author: Tor Willy Austerslått <twa AT sesamdata DOT no>; Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 08:02:13 +0200; On 7. apr. 2011, at 03.07, Rodrigo Renie Braga wrote: I guess it would be nice to have priorities separated per Storage... 2011/4/6 <ewan.brown AT stfc.ac DOT uk> You are right that no priority 10 jo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2011-04/msg00123.html (12,968 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]