Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Optimizing\s+disk\s+based\s+backups\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Optimizing\s+disk\s+based\s+backups\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Optimizing disk based backups (score: 1): Author: "Michael Short" <mdshort AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 13:31:09 -0500; Hello, I realize that Bacula was originally developed for tape based backup systems, but disk space is becoming more inexpensive everyday. It is cheaper and more reliable to maintain a system which u; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-05/msg00496.html (12,361 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] Optimizing disk based backups (score: 1): Author: Ryan Novosielski <novosirj AT umdnj DOT edu>; Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 14:48:51 -0400; Don't disk-based volumes use fseek as of quite awhile ago? Or is this not what you're talking about? - -- -- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.|IST/AST - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-05/msg00499.html (13,460 bytes)
3. Re: [Bacula-users] Optimizing disk based backups (score: 1): Author: Alan Brown <ajb2 AT mssl.ucl.ac DOT uk>; Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 12:02:14 +0100 (BST); Perhaps for small backups. I'd hate to use disks for the 40+ TB I'm backing up now, or the 250TB system I'm supposed to be commissioning in a few months. Tapes have several big advantages over disks:; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-05/msg00574.html (12,590 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]