Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Monitoring\s+bacula\s+with\s+Nagios\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Monitoring bacula with Nagios (score: 1)
Author: Mike <mike AT csits DOT net>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:21:53 +0000
Folks, Does anyone have any tips for montioring Bacula with Nagios? Ideally I was thinking of connecting to the sockets and doing a hello to make sure it was happy. I haven't been able to find any pl
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-03/msg00609.html (12,588 bytes)

2. Re: [Bacula-users] Monitoring bacula with Nagios (score: 1)
Author: mark.bergman AT uphs.upenn DOT edu
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:24:39 -0400
Yes. Sure. I'm using the Nagios "nrpe" facility to have the nagios server issue calls to each client to run the nagios "check_procs" command, looking for the presence of the process "bacula-fd". You
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-03/msg00610.html (14,099 bytes)

3. Re: [Bacula-users] Monitoring bacula with Nagios (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Keane <subscription AT kkeane DOT com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:52:11 -0700
I found a check_bacula plugin somewhere - I think on nagiosexchange. It looks at the bacula log files for the last day, and issues a warning if any backups have failed. It also reports on the total n
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-03/msg00611.html (13,629 bytes)

4. Re: [Bacula-users] Monitoring bacula with Nagios (score: 1)
Author: "Masopust, Christian" <christian.masopust AT siemens DOT com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:51:14 +0100
Hello Mike, have you already downloaded the source (.tar.gz) of Bacula? In it's bacula-2.x.x/examples/nagios you'll find everything you wish :-) christian -- "I sense much NT in you, NT leads to Blue
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-03/msg00612.html (13,414 bytes)

5. Re: [Bacula-users] Monitoring bacula with Nagios (score: 1)
Author: Marc DeTrano <marc AT gridshield DOT net>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:22:27 -0600
I focus mainly on using "Run After Job"'s to run a script for send_nsca. In my case, the primary concern is that the jobs run, run without errors, and are complete by the time I think they should be
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-03/msg00619.html (12,521 bytes)

6. Re: [Bacula-users] Monitoring bacula with Nagios (score: 1)
Author: Charlie Reddington <charlie.reddington AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:09:03 -0500
We've done the most basic setup here, we use check_procs and look for bacula. If the process dies, it'll bitch. This way we usually catch problems before they happen. If bacula is just not happy in g
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-03/msg00620.html (13,326 bytes)

7. Re: [Bacula-users] Monitoring bacula with Nagios (score: 1)
Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:47:32 -0400
Have you ever seen bacula die? I mean in 5 years of using bacula on 35 to 50 machines I do not recall ever seeing bacula die. John -- _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mail
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-03/msg00623.html (12,690 bytes)

8. Re: [Bacula-users] Monitoring bacula with Nagios (score: 1)
Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:48:41 -0400
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:47 AM, John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com> wrote: Ahh. Maybe once there was a bug in the storage daemon but that was very long ago. John -- ________________________
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-03/msg00624.html (13,016 bytes)

9. Re: [Bacula-users] Monitoring bacula with Nagios (score: 1)
Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:51:12 -0400
Now I remember bat used to crash bacula-dir all the time on long queries as a result I do not use bat on the work network.. John -- _______________________________________________ Bacula-users maili
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-03/msg00625.html (12,952 bytes)

10. Re: [Bacula-users] Monitoring bacula with Nagios (score: 1)
Author: Charlie Reddington <charlie.reddington AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:14:04 -0500
Yep! The client side did. -- _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-us
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-03/msg00626.html (13,235 bytes)

11. Re: [Bacula-users] Monitoring bacula with Nagios (score: 1)
Author: Steve Thompson <smt AT vgersoft DOT com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:20:09 -0400 (EDT)
Yep; storage daemon (2.4.2) dies on me about once a month. I get a file daemon failure about once a month too, but of course there's a lot more of those. Incidentally, when the file daemon dies, the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-03/msg00628.html (12,705 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu