Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+It\'s\s+possible\s+to\s+have\s+this\s+configuration\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+It\'s\s+possible\s+to\s+have\s+this\s+configuration\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] It's possible to have this configuration (score: 1): Author: "Reynier Perez Mira" <rperezm AT uci DOT cu>; Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 09:18:49 -0400; Hi, I'm asking if is possible to have this Bacula configuration? I mean the Director, Console, Storage and Client in the same machine as primary backup server and Director,Console,Storage in a second; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-05/msg00284.html (11,757 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] It's possible to have this configuration (score: 1): Author: "John Drescher" <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:03:02 -0400; Although in the past (4 years ago or more with bacula 1.36) I have had 2 directors with one database the devs tell me this is not recommended. Other than that you can have as many storage daemons as; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-05/msg00289.html (12,139 bytes)
3. Re: [Bacula-users] It's possible to have this configuration (score: 1): Author: "John Drescher" <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:04:01 -0400; Although in the past (4 years ago or more with bacula 1.36) I have had 2 directors with one database the devs tell me this is not recommended. Other than that you can have as many storage daemons as; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-05/msg00290.html (12,138 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]