Author: Craig Shiroma <shiroma.craig.2 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:23:58 -1000
Hello, Currently, all my backups start at a certain time of the day. The order in which Bacula runs them appears to be alphabetically. I have some long running backups. I was wondering if there is
Author: Bill Arlofski <waa-bacula AT revpol DOT com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 22:28:04 -0400
Hi Craig, You can set the priority of the jobs to a lower number, making them a higher priority (default Priority is 10). If they are using the same schedule and start at the same time as the other j
Author: Craig Shiroma <shiroma.craig.2 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:02:55 -1000
Hi Craig, You can set the priority of the jobs to a lower number, making them a higher priority (default Priority is 10). If they are using the same schedule and start at the same time as the other
Author: Heitor Faria <heitor AT bacula.com DOT br>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 08:05:24 -0200 (BRST)
I thought about changing the job priority. However, Bill as you mentioned, I read the caveat in the manual about the lower priority jobs having to wait until the higher priority ones finish. This won
Author: Phil Stracchino <phils AT caerllewys DOT net>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 08:07:34 -0400
If you need jobs to run concurrently, but start in a specified order, pretty much the only way you can accomplish it is to assign them to staged schedules. -- Phil Stracchino Babylon Communications p
Author: Dimitri Maziuk <dmaziuk AT bmrb.wisc DOT edu>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 09:38:09 -0500
What are you trying to achieve? If you spool them and allow concurrent jobs, you may be able to get the short-running ones done while long-running ones are running. Dima -- __________________________
Author: Craig Shiroma <shiroma.craig.2 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:15:56 -1000
What are you trying to achieve? If you spool them and allow concurrent jobs, you may be able to get the short-running ones done while long-running ones are running. Dima -- _________________________
On Oct 29, 2015, at 8:07 AM, Phil Stracchino <phils AT caerllewys DOT net> wrote: I like that this thread appeared. It is something I have been thinking about for a week or two. I have three categori
Author: Bill Shirley <bill AT ShirleyFamily DOT net>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 17:12:43 -0500
With the time wise assumption that Full > Differential > Increment and me wanting to get the shorter jobs out of the way, I use: Schedule { Name = "MonthlySundayFull1" Run = Full
On Nov 6, 2015, at 5:12 PM, Bill Shirley <bill AT ShirleyFamily DOT net> wrote: With the time wise assumption that Full > Differential > Increment and me wanting to get the shorter jobs out of the wa
Author: Bill Shirley <bill AT ShirleyFamily DOT net>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 17:56:19 -0500
Your right. Sorry. I should get some sleep. Bill On 11/6/2015 5:52 PM, Dan Langille wrote: On Nov 6, 2015, at 5:12 PM, Bill Shirley <bill AT ShirleyFamily DOT net> wrote: With the time wise assumpti
Author: Craig Shiroma <shiroma.craig.2 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 13:10:30 -1000
I am only using one schedule and tried setting "Allow Mixed Priority = yes" in all my jobs, but could not get things to work. At the start time for the schedule, all jobs would get queued. However,
Author: Heitor Faria <heitor AT bacula.com DOT br>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 21:17:31 -0200 (BRST)
Hello Dan, nice to see you. Yes, 3:04 jobs will all start before any 3:05 jobs regardless of their priority. It seems AllowMixedPriority only works when higher priority jobs are submitted after lowe
Author: Craig Shiroma <shiroma.craig.2 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 23:38:26 -1000
Hi Heitor, >Other way to prioritize jobs without creating a critical path between them is reorganizing their order like they appear in the bacula-dir.conf, I think even if they are in included split
On Nov 7, 2015, at 4:38 AM, Craig Shiroma <shiroma.craig.2 AT gmail DOT com> wrote: Hi Heitor, >Other way to prioritize jobs without creating a critical path between them is reorganizing their order