Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Bug\s+or\s+misuse\,\s+file\s+are\s+not\s+save\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Bug\s+or\s+misuse\,\s+file\s+are\s+not\s+save\s+\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Bug or misuse, file are not save ? (score: 1): Author: Olivier Delestre <olivier.delestre AT univ-rouen DOT fr>; Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:27:48 +0200; Hello, A bug in bacula or misuse, I do not know. Let me explain. I have a folder 1 that is saved. I have a folder 2 that is not. The directories are on the same partition. Execution of a total folder; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-04/msg00439.html (12,083 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] Bug or misuse, file are not save ? (score: 1): Author: Mike Ruskai <thannyd AT earthlink DOT net>; Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:48:16 -0400; http://www.bacula.org/en/rel-manual/Current_State_Bacula.html#SECTION00530000000000000000 Note the third bullet point. Apparently it still hasn't been addressed in v3.0.0. It seems easy enough to che; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-04/msg00440.html (12,820 bytes)
3. Re: [Bacula-users] Bug or misuse, file are not save ? (score: 1): Author: Arno Lehmann <al AT its-lehmann DOT de>; Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:08:29 +0200; Hi, Yes. This is also described in the manual. It's the design (and not that of Bacula only, by the way). Accurate backups work fine in 3.0 (or, here, in 2.5.42). If a file is not in the catalog it i; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2009-04/msg00457.html (13,601 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]