Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Bacula\s+with\s+LVM\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Bacula-users] Bacula with LVM (score: 1)
Author: togum <bacula-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:03:54 -0500
I have a File Server with 12 hardisks. I used LVM technology. I wanna ask, what should I do if there are one hardisk crash in File Server? What effect by LVM? Thanks advanced! +-- +-- -- Download Int
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2010-02/msg00463.html (11,627 bytes)

2. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula with LVM (score: 1)
Author: Tino Schwarze <bacula-users AT tisc DOT de>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:40:36 +0100
Hi togum, The bacula list is probably not the right place to ask LVM-related questions. If one disk drops out of an LVM, all data on that disk will be lost; it's possible that all of the data is lost
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2010-02/msg00465.html (12,040 bytes)

3. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula with LVM (score: 1)
Author: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:52:08 -0500
I use LVM on every server that I have. I follow one very important rule. Never use any PV (physical volume) inside the LVM that is not a RAID 1 or better. If you use individual drives in your LVM yo
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2010-02/msg00475.html (11,796 bytes)

4. Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula with LVM (score: 1)
Author: Phil Stracchino <alaric AT metrocast DOT net>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:34:34 -0500
And just as a reminder ... RAID0 should ONLY ever be used in cases where you want the maximum speed of access to the data, but DON'T CARE IF YOU LOSE IT. (For example, if it's all easily replaceable
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2010-02/msg00492.html (12,704 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu