Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+\[Bacula\-devel\]\s+Possibility\s+of\s+parallelising\s+encryption\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+\[Bacula\-devel\]\s+Possibility\s+of\s+parallelising\s+encryption\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Possibility of parallelising encryption? (score: 1): Author: Steve Polyack <korvus AT comcast DOT net>; Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:56:27 -0400; I've tried the above (loading and registering engines, specifically selecting various hardware engines) twice in the past and did not come up with anything useful. Bacula would crash after the first; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2010-04/msg00230.html (14,396 bytes)
2. Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Possibility of parallelising encryption? (score: 1): Author: Craig Ringer <craig AT postnewspapers.com DOT au>; Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:02:09 +0800; Ouch. That'd be really good. Do you remember finding any useful backtraces? Yep. The added instructions on the new Intel chips should make a dent though :-) -- Craig Ringer -- Download Intel® Pa; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2010-04/msg00232.html (14,736 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]