- 1. [BackupPC-users] OK but why? (score: 1)
- Author: cantthinkofanickname <backuppc-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 04:15:35 -0500
- But if I do that do I now have to go round to every Windows PC I need to backup and install something. I thought the idea of SMB was to avoid that stage. Maybe I'm wrong here? Any particular reason t
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2008-12/msg00311.html (11,494 bytes)
- 2. Re: [BackupPC-users] OK but why? (score: 1)
- Author: tmassey AT obscorp DOT com
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:09:47 -0500
- cantthinkofanickname <backuppc-forum AT backupcentral DOT com> wrote on 12/20/2008 04:15:35 AM: Myriads of reasons. First, you have a *lot* of layers between the raw files on both systems: there's th
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2008-12/msg00336.html (12,373 bytes)
- 3. Re: [BackupPC-users] OK but why? (score: 1)
- Author: dan <dandenson AT gmail DOT com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:11:56 -0700
- Myriads of reasons. First, you have a *lot* of layers between the raw files on both systems: there's the Server service on the Windows side that abstracts the representation of the files as it provi
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2008-12/msg00343.html (14,328 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu