Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+Feature\s+Requests\s+and\s+such\?\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [BackupPC-users] Feature Requests and such? (score: 1)
Author: "Clint Alexander" <clint AT cdalexander DOT net>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 09:07:11 -0400
Hi BackupPC List Members (and owners).. One thing that has frustrated the heck out of me is the lack of finding an organized system for feature requests. Like many of you, I have a few features that
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-08/msg00154.html (15,944 bytes)

2. Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature Requests and such? (score: 1)
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:02:08 -0500
That would be fairly hard to predict if you have more than a few machines because it will be your concurrency limit that keeps backups from starting - and you'd need to know how long the previous bac
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-08/msg00155.html (14,493 bytes)

3. Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature Requests and such? (score: 1)
Author: "Clint Alexander" <clint AT cdalexander DOT net>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:40:44 -0400
This is something that can be computed automagically by BackupPC to estimate (albiet not exact). Right, I could follow a trend that would be based off of current configuration -- but so could Backup
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-08/msg00156.html (18,148 bytes)

4. Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature Requests and such? (score: 1)
Author: "Angus Scott-Fleming" <backuppc AT geoapps DOT com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:09:00 -0700
A critical missing feature to me is the ability to mirror my BackupPC unit to another unit offsite. The extensive use of hardlinks prevents rsync from being the right solution here. -- Angus S-F // G
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-08/msg00157.html (13,716 bytes)

5. Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature Requests and such? (score: 1)
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:13:54 -0500
Not really - your fulls will most likely take enough longer that it will skew the times the next set start, and your fulls are probably (and should be) running on different days for different machine
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-08/msg00158.html (16,533 bytes)

6. Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature Requests and such? (score: 1)
Author: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists AT websitemanagers.com DOT au>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:15:59 +1000
I may be out of line here, but I think you might have a config similar to this: $Conf{FullPeriod} = 6.97; $Conf{IncrPeriod} = 0.97; $Conf{BlackoutPeriods} = [ { 'hourBegin' => '4' 'hourEnd' => '3', '
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-08/msg00159.html (16,450 bytes)

7. Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature Requests and such? (score: 1)
Author: "Clint Alexander" <clint AT cdalexander DOT net>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:10:20 -0400
I'm not the best when it comes to being completely educated in the way backups systems work. My area of expertise can be better defined as a "Jack of All" and master of few. But, I took some time to
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-08/msg00163.html (21,115 bytes)

8. Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature Requests and such? (score: 1)
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:54:17 -0500
You could just bump the FullPeriod and IncrPeriod values up to a bit longer than when you expect your cron-started runs to have finished. That way the scheduler would only start a run if you disable
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-08/msg00164.html (13,926 bytes)

9. Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature Requests and such? (score: 1)
Author: "Angus Scott-Fleming" <backuppc AT geoapps DOT com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:57:14 -0700
Re: [BackupPC-users] backup of backup machine "Note that using -H to reconstruct hardlinks only works for links among the files traversed during a single rsync run." http://www.mail-archive.com/backu
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-08/msg00173.html (16,595 bytes)

10. Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature Requests and such? (score: 1)
Author: Holger Parplies <wbppc AT parplies DOT de>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:25:08 +0200
Hi list, I don't seem to find as much time for posting on this list lately as I'd like to. Since that won't change for at least two weeks, I'll write a few short comments now. Please excuse me for be
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-08/msg00180.html (15,958 bytes)

11. Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature Requests and such? (score: 1)
Author: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists AT websitemanagers.com DOT au>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:42:42 +1000
I'd like information. [BackupPC-users] Feature Requests and such?]: among http://www.mail-archive.com/backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net/msg04386.html runs ... What about syncing pool, cpool
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-08/msg00181.html (16,608 bytes)

12. Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature Requests and such? (score: 1)
Author: Holger Parplies <wbppc AT parplies DOT de>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:56:04 +0200
Hi, Adam Goryachev wrote on 2009-08-17 13:15:59 +1000 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature Requests and such?]: the problem is, that is not the way BackupPC works. BackupPC is very "dynamic" about schedulin
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-08/msg00182.html (16,718 bytes)

13. Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature Requests and such? (score: 1)
Author: Holger Parplies <wbppc AT parplies DOT de>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 03:12:11 +0200
Hi, Adam Goryachev wrote on 2009-08-18 10:42:42 +1000 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature Requests and such?]: it might work, but you don't gain anything, as rsync would need to keep a list of all inodes i
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-08/msg00184.html (15,247 bytes)

14. Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature Requests and such? (score: 1)
Author: Holger Parplies <wbppc AT parplies DOT de>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 03:23:54 +0200
Hi, Clint Alexander wrote on 2009-08-17 09:10:20 -0400 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature Requests and such?]: that's because you've got an extraneous parameter (<pass>), which probably evaluates to 'true
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-08/msg00185.html (14,598 bytes)

15. Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature Requests and such? (score: 1)
Author: "Clint Alexander" <clint AT cdalexander DOT net>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:12:22 -0400
Ahhh -- I read the instructions incorrectly (or too fast -- same thing). Thanks! With these 4 particular servers, if it's not done within the same hour then any backup would be a waste of space. The
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2009-08/msg00191.html (16,469 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu