Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+Backup\s+backuppc\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey AT BUC DOT com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 10:14:55 -0400
First, if you are changing topics, please create a new thread rather than replying to an existing thread. This question is asked on a regular basis. You should be able to find lots of into in the mai
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2011-05/msg00238.html (13,512 bytes)

2. [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: Farmol SPA <farmolspa AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:18:26 +0200
Hi list. I would like to ask which is the simplest yet effective way to dump backuppc stuff (mainly __TOPDIR__) eg to a removable hard disk that will be used in a disaster recovery scenario where the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-08/msg00096.html (12,764 bytes)

3. [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: Farmol SPA <farmolspa AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:00:08 +0200
Hi list. I would like to ask which is the simplest yet effective way to dump backuppc stuff (mainly __TOPDIR__) eg to a removable hard disk that will be used in a disaster recovery scenario where the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-08/msg00104.html (12,746 bytes)

4. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: Mirco Piccin <pictux AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:25:38 +0200
Hi list. I would like to ask which is the simplest yet effective way to dump backuppc stuff (mainly __TOPDIR__) eg to a removable hard disk that will be used in a disaster recovery scenario where the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-08/msg00106.html (13,671 bytes)

5. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:31:46 -0500
If your archive is small and you have plenty of RAM you may be able to do it with rsync -aH, but there is a limit to what you can copy in a reasonable amount of time because there is not an efficient
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-08/msg00107.html (13,533 bytes)

6. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: Farmol SPA <farmolspa AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:30:04 +0200
I am tempted to dump with "dd" or tar the whole _TOPDIR_ to a file, but I am not an old-time user of hardlinks and I don't know if this will do the trick, especially when restoring the dump. BTW, I t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-08/msg00122.html (14,647 bytes)

7. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: Farmol SPA <farmolspa AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:15:06 +0200
-- Original Message -- Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc From: Mirco Piccin <pictux AT gmail DOT com> To: General list for user discussion, questions and support <backuppc-users AT lists.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-08/msg00140.html (15,531 bytes)

8. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: Mirco Piccin <pictux AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:02:53 +0200
Hi > I would like to ask which is the simplest yet effective way to dump > backuppc stuff (mainly __TOPDIR__) eg to a removable hard disk that will > be used in a disaster recovery scenario where the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-08/msg00141.html (13,806 bytes)

9. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: Farmol SPA <farmolspa AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:23:39 +0200
TOPDIR resides on an LVM volume. I know about snapshots but I've never tried them in practice. Is it difficult? How could I take a snapshot of a volume and put it on another disk (external USB device
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-08/msg00142.html (14,374 bytes)

10. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler J. Wagner" <tyler AT tolaris DOT com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:48:15 +0100
It's easy. I've done it on two of our BackupPC servers, and have a weekly dump of the BackupPC filesystem between them. Documented here: http://www.tolaris.com/2010/04/23/using-lvm-to-make-a-live-cop
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-08/msg00143.html (14,110 bytes)

11. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: Farmol SPA <farmolspa AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:32:10 +0200
Thanks for this info! A question: the source logical volume and the snapshot one must reside in the same volume group for this feature to work? Alessandro Attachment: signature.asc Description: OpenP
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-08/msg00144.html (15,035 bytes)

12. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 07:51:56 -0500
The practical limit for rsync or other file-oriented copies has more to do with the number of hardlinks than the size of the archive. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com -- This SF.net email
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-08/msg00145.html (14,727 bytes)

13. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler J. Wagner" <tyler AT tolaris DOT com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:00:37 +0100
I believe a snapshot of a logical volume must necessarily reside in the same volume group, yes. So if you have an LV which is 100% of the VG, you must resize it down or add disks to make it larger. R
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-08/msg00146.html (14,106 bytes)

14. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: Farmol SPA <farmolspa AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:09:02 +0200
I made some tests and the snapshot must belong to the same vg of the source lv. So, whenever I create the snapshot I have a "static" copy of the source lv that I can copy with any method (eg rsync or
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-08/msg00148.html (15,372 bytes)

15. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: Mirco Piccin <pictux AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:28:05 +0200
Hi Believe me, now you are sure that BackupPC is "sleeping" during the copy, but tomorrow and tomorrow again with one more server/pc to backup, and another one, and so on..? - if the logical volume i
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-08/msg00149.html (14,841 bytes)

16. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler J. Wagner" <tyler AT tolaris DOT com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:27:34 +0100
You did; it's the hard link problem of BackupPC and rsync. See here: http://www.tolaris.com/2010/04/23/using-lvm-to-make-a-live-copy-of-a-backuppcpool/ The LVM snapshot is so you can take a copy of t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-08/msg00150.html (14,951 bytes)

17. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: Farmol SPA <farmolspa AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:46:18 +0200
-- Original Message -- Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc From: Mirco Piccin <pictux AT gmail DOT com> To: General list for user discussion, questions and support <backuppc-users AT lists.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-08/msg00151.html (16,340 bytes)

18. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:10:32 -0500
No, you make a snapshot on the internal drive containing the archive - or you unmount the archive partition. Snapshots aren't mounted and don't change - thus the advantage of using them. You copy the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-08/msg00153.html (15,861 bytes)

19. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: "Jeffrey J. Kosowsky" <backuppc AT kosowsky DOT org>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:13:01 -0400
Les Mikesell wrote at about 07:51:56 -0500 on Friday, August 20, 2010: And just to be clear the consequence of what Les is saying is that it is unlikely to be much if at all faster the next time. --
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-08/msg00154.html (15,092 bytes)

20. Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup backuppc (score: 1)
Author: "Jeffrey J. Kosowsky" <backuppc AT kosowsky DOT org>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:18:42 -0400
Farmol SPA wrote at about 16:09:02 +0200 on Friday, August 20, 2010: Yes - you are missing something that multiple posters have tried to tell you. The problem is the number of hardlinks and not the a
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2010-08/msg00155.html (16,312 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu