Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+for\s+those\s+using\s+VTL\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+for\s+those\s+using\s+VTL\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [ADSM-L] for those using VTL (score: 1): Author: IG Coolen <ilja.coolen AT ABP DOT NL>; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:28:27 +0200; Nice one. I was also curious, and we have some info to share too. 1. For a short term temporary solution we chose Diligent Virtual Tape Facility for Open including ProtecTIER. 2. Hmmm. Not quite. We; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-04/msg00009.html (14,159 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] for those using VTL (score: 1): Author: Charles A Hart <charles_hart AT UHC DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:57:20 -0500; We too are using ProtectTier, started with VTF-Open. VTFopen in a Clustered environment is fast a 2node Cluster 100MBS. We expected better factoring, in additional to removing client side compression; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-04/msg00019.html (15,712 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] for those using VTL (score: 1): Author: Jon Evans <Jon.Evans AT KBR DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 17:22:56 +0100; We are also using Diligent ProtecTier, and are in the process of migrating to Netbackup from TSM :-( As a result we are taking weekly full backups and the hyperfactoring is great.. averaging around 3; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-04/msg00023.html (17,051 bytes)
4. [ADSM-L] for those using VTL (score: 1): Author: "Gill, Geoffrey L." <GEOFFREY.L.GILL AT SAIC DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:06:02 -0700; We have a number of vendors coming in with their wares and I was wondering if those who use a VTL might pass on some info. As you all know when you're in these types of sales pitches you always hear; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-03/msg00377.html (11,962 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] for those using VTL (score: 1): Author: Mahesh Tailor <MTailor AT CARILION DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:20:10 -0400; See below . . . We have a number of vendors coming in with their wares and I was wondering if those who use a VTL might pass on some info. As you all know when you're in these types of sales pitches; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-03/msg00379.html (12,153 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] for those using VTL (score: 1): Author: Nancy L Backhaus <Backhaus.Nancy AT HEALTHNOW DOT ORG>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 08:02:20 -0400; not allot of information right now for you... 1. We chose the EMCs' CDL 4100 - In the process of implementing it within the next few weeks. 2. Will keep you posted. 3. Will keep you posted. 4. Within; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-03/msg00388.html (13,248 bytes)
7. Re: [ADSM-L] for those using VTL (score: 1): Author: "Johnson, Milton" <milton.johnson AT CITIGROUP DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:01:45 -0400; 1. Sepaton 2. Yes 3. No 4. No 5. No It's just a fast library. Eliminates the need for collocation. Thanks, Milton Johnson --Original Message-- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIS; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-03/msg00398.html (12,473 bytes)
8. Re: [ADSM-L] for those using VTL (score: 1): Author: "Mcnutt, Larry E." <larry.mcnutt AT TIMKEN DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:24:36 -0400; 1. EMC 2. Yes 3. Yes. We acquired the CDL700 almost 3 years ago. It was version 1.1 and one of the first shipped. This caused major problems when it came time to expand the capacity - multiple upgrad; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-03/msg00400.html (13,105 bytes)
9. Re: [ADSM-L] for those using VTL (score: 1): Author: "Schneider, John" <schnjd AT STLO.MERCY DOT NET>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:41:19 -0500; Here are our answers: 1. EMC CDL (now called EMC Disk Library) 2. Yes. Backup is fast; eliminates the need to migrate from disk to tape; reclamation is much faster; backup stgpool is faster. It allow; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-03/msg00402.html (13,481 bytes)
10. Re: [ADSM-L] for those using VTL (score: 1): Author: Victoria Ortepio <victoria.ortepio AT VERIZONBUSINESS DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:57:59 -0400; We have SEPATON here. SEPATON is a 'standalone' solution vs 'integrated' that you get with EMC. That is, with standalone, TSM has full control of all onsite and offsite tapes. With an integrated libr; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-03/msg00404.html (14,563 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]