Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Volume\s+size\s+on\s+sequential\s+disk\s+storage\s+pools\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Volume\s+size\s+on\s+sequential\s+disk\s+storage\s+pools\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] Volume size on sequential disk storage pools (score: 1): Author: Michael Glad <glad AT DAIMI.AU DOT DK>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:14:54 +0200; Hello TSM'ers, are there any recommendations/experiences concerning volume size/ maximum number of volumes on sequential disk storage pools? On our largest TSM server, we currently have a 27T pool co; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-09/msg00151.html (11,175 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] Volume size on sequential disk storage pools (score: 1): Author: Howard Coles <Howard.Coles AT ARDENTHEALTH DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 08:36:51 -0500; I would think the best way to keep TSM from getting into trouble would be to limit the number of mounts. This will keep you from having too many 10G files going at any one time. OR Increase the file; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-09/msg00155.html (12,485 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] Volume size on sequential disk storage pools (score: 1): Author: "Conway, Timothy" <tim.conway AT JBSSWIFT DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 08:42:21 -0600; I know of no TSM-based limit. I personally have 1672 25037MB FILE-class volumes on 88 filesystems. The volume size was chosen to entirely fill the filesystems. The filesystem size was chosen to fit e; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-09/msg00157.html (12,274 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]