Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+TSM\s+5\.5\s+using\s+LANFree\s+backup\s+really\s+\"slow\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+TSM\s+5\.5\s+using\s+LANFree\s+backup\s+really\s+\"slow\"\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.5 using LANFree backup really "slow" (score: 1): Author: Steven Harris <steve AT STEVENHARRIS DOT INFO>; Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:51:50 +1000; Flavio Is the destination of your backup pool tape? Have you confirmed with VALIDATE LANFREE on the server Are you seeing a "proxied by" message in the client log to indicate that the storage agent i; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-08/msg00000.html (14,110 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.5 using LANFree backup really "slow" (score: 1): Author: Flavio Junior <billpp AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 11:37:55 -0300; Hi Steve, thanks for answering... Yeah, the destination is tape, i see on StorageAgent console the connection to server and opening tape, during the backup I see the bytes increasing on "Backup by LA; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-08/msg00002.html (16,709 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.5 using LANFree backup really "slow" (score: 1): Author: David McClelland <david.mcclelland AT NETWORKC.CO DOT UK>; Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:02:40 +0100; What is the nature of the data that you're backing up here? Large files/objects or lots of smaller files/objects? The classic recommendation for SAN backups direct to tape is that it's best used only; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-08/msg00004.html (17,123 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.5 using LANFree backup really "slow" (score: 1): Author: Flavio Junior <billpp AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 13:09:37 -0300; Hi David, Well FileServer is exact what i'm backup ;/ A lot of files with sizes between 100k and 20Mb. So, there is nothing that can be done to improve this, at least for 100GB/h? Just to point my he; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-08/msg00009.html (19,402 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.5 using LANFree backup really "slow" (score: 1): Author: Steven Langdale <Steven.Langdale AT CAT DOT COM>; Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 17:36:43 +0100; LAN Free will be poor with this kind of data. What is your actual backup & restore requirement? What's your backup window, how much data and how much changed data per day. Steven Steven Langdale Glob; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-08/msg00010.html (20,114 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.5 using LANFree backup really "slow" (score: 1): Author: Flavio Junior <billpp AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 11:26:03 -0300; Hi Steve... Well, my backup windows is something like 10 12 hours, size of a full backup is near of 2TB and incremental per day not bigger than 20G. My idea is to perform a full backup on thursday (t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-08/msg00013.html (22,192 bytes)
7. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.5 using LANFree backup really "slow" (score: 1): Author: Steven Harris <steve AT STEVENHARRIS DOT INFO>; Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 01:27:16 +1000; Flavio You didn't say what your client machine is. How about an image copy and a complete incremental on the weekend and a incremental-by-date on other days. For a full restore you can restore the im; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-08/msg00014.html (13,381 bytes)
8. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 5.5 using LANFree backup really "slow" (score: 1): Author: Yudi Darmadi <yudi AT NIAGAPRIMA DOT COM>; Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 14:03:24 +0700; Hi, Maybe You can try this first:, using Operating system backup, try to backup direct to tape, and see the result. I've been facing this kind of problem, file server backup using LANFree. Total data; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-08/msg00018.html (14,101 bytes)
9. [ADSM-L] TSM 5.5 using LANFree backup really "slow" (score: 1): Author: Flavio Junior <billpp AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:38:55 -0300; Hi folks, I'm here, again, asking for help :) More I read, more doubts I have. I'm now implementing a TSM For SAN setup, to performance comparison with my currently LAN backup. I'll describe my scena; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2009-07/msg00434.html (11,905 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]