Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+More\s+files\s+in\s+copy\s+pool\s+than\s+primary\s+pool\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+More\s+files\s+in\s+copy\s+pool\s+than\s+primary\s+pool\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [ADSM-L] More files in copy pool than primary pool? (score: 1): Author: Chavdar Cholev <chavdar.cholev AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 00:20:13 +0200; how many pri stg pools do you have and what is hierarchy (next stg) the other thing is check expire inventory process for errors Chavdar; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-12/msg00049.html (13,071 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] More files in copy pool than primary pool? (score: 1): Author: Skylar Thompson <skylar2 AT U.WASHINGTON DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 18:18:42 -0800; I think if you do a MOVE NODEDATA to migrate data from one primary pool to another, the data in the copy pool stays intact. I don't think there is a way to expire it other than through the normal nod; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-12/msg00051.html (13,302 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] More files in copy pool than primary pool? (score: 1): Author: "Ehresman,David E." <deehre01 AT LOUISVILLE DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 16:17:35 +0000; As the q occ shows, there are two storage pools. nr-pvl is the primary and nr-ofl is the secondary. David how many pri stg pools do you have and what is hierarchy (next stg) the other thing is check; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-12/msg00059.html (13,571 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] More files in copy pool than primary pool? (score: 1): Author: "Ehresman,David E." <deehre01 AT LOUISVILLE DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 16:19:17 +0000; No move data involved. In fact, the problem persists after deleting all the copy pool volumes for this node and doing a fresh backup stg. David I think if you do a MOVE NODEDATA to migrate data from; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-12/msg00062.html (13,843 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] More files in copy pool than primary pool? (score: 1): Author: "Sheridan, Peter T." <Peter.Sheridan AT CUNAMUTUAL DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:08:47 +0000; What is retention set on copy pools versus primary pools ? If you're doing that level of evaluation, then I suggest you q contents for the node on the various volumes, and reconcile them. - Allen S.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-12/msg00075.html (12,303 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] More files in copy pool than primary pool? (score: 1): Author: "Allen S. Rout" <asr AT UFL DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:42:03 -0500; If you're doing that level of evaluation, then I suggest you q contents for the node on the various volumes, and reconcile them. - Allen S. Rout; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-12/msg00076.html (11,785 bytes)
7. Re: [ADSM-L] More files in copy pool than primary pool? (score: 1): Author: Maurice van 't Loo <maurice AT BACKITUP DOT NU>; Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:52:35 +0100; I saw this in multiple environments and as long it's not that copy has less objects than primary, I actually don't care ;-) Is it possible that if a file exists in multiple aggregates (i.e. big files; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2012-12/msg00085.html (13,139 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]