Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+INCLUDE\s+for\s+new\s+management\s+class\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: Fred Johanson <Fred AT UCHICAGO DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:41:26 -0600
Andy, His additions are at the bottom of his dsm.opt file. There is also a client optionset that has: Include ?:* FILESERVER Fred Johanson TSM Administrator University of Chicago 773-702-8464 --Origi
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00000.html (14,244 bytes)

2. Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:47:36 -0700
Yes, but it's not position in the dsm.opt file that matters when client option sets are at issue. Use "dsmc query inclexcl" to see the final list that TSM actually uses. I suspect it is that client o
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00001.html (16,237 bytes)

3. Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: "Strand, Neil B." <NBStrand AT LMUS.LEGGMASON DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:50:59 -0500
The options defined in server client optins have precidence Any include-exclude statements in the server client option set have priority over the include-exclude statements in the local client option
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00002.html (18,200 bytes)

4. Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:11:38 -0700
Hi Fred, FORCE has no effect on INCLEXCL, so that's a nonstarter. Try this: remove the INCLUDE statement from the dsm.opt file and instead add it to the client option set on the server. But instead o
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00004.html (42,361 bytes)

5. Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 11:33:41 -0700
A couple of things: 1. Is the actual machine name "tank1.ad.uchicago.edu"? In other words, if from that machine you run SET COMPUTERNAME from an OS prompt, is that what it shows? Or does it just show
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00009.html (19,669 bytes)

6. Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: Fred Johanson <Fred AT UCHICAGO DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:00:42 -0600
There are no 'INCLUDE' lines in the option set other than the initial one. This is the dsm.opt: EXCLUDE.BACKUP "*:\microsoft uam volume\...\*" EXCLUDE.BACKUP "*:\microsoft uam volume\...\*.*" EXCLUDE
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00011.html (27,828 bytes)

7. Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: Fred Johanson <Fred AT UCHICAGO DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 12:39:08 -0600
Here's the result of q fi: Node Name Filespace FSID Platform Name -- -- -- -- TANK1.AD.UCHIC- \\tank1\f$ 1 WinNT AGO.EDU TANK1.AD.UCHIC- \\tank1\c$ 2 WinNT AGO.EDU TANK1.AD.UCHIC- \\tank1\d$ 3 WinNT
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00014.html (20,339 bytes)

8. Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 11:44:49 -0700
OK, so my comments re: your INCLUDE file spec stand. Once that is fixed up to match the actual file space name, it should work. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Cl
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00016.html (22,402 bytes)

9. Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:21:03 -0700
OK, the Q INCLEXCL output is what we're interested in. You read the Q INCLEXCL from the top down (opposite of the dsm.opt file). Notice that all the dir excludes (EXCLUDE.DIR) are at the top, since t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00021.html (32,786 bytes)

10. Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: Fred Johanson <Fred AT UCHICAGO DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:08:30 -0600
Andy, I think I have it. Neither of us spotted the "$f" instead of "f$", but here is the latest inclexcl list. He'll let me know tomorrow morning. ** FILE INCLUDE/EXCLUDE ** Mode Function Pattern (ma
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00028.html (23,701 bytes)

11. Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: Fred Johanson <Fred AT UCHICAGO DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:38:30 -0600
So how does he get what he wants. The option set is to set a management class for a number of clients. The new management class applies to 1 of the 10. Will setting the OVERRIDE=yes have the desired
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00029.html (33,244 bytes)

12. Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:35:23 -0500
Our desktop support unit has a user that wants a new retention policy on their file share. The admin added this to the dsm.opt: INCLUDE "F:\NSIT\FieldSupport\University Administration\Budget Office\
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00031.html (12,612 bytes)

13. Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: Fred Johanson <Fred AT UCHICAGO DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:17:33 -0600
"Does not work", his term, which means the files show up on the gui as being in the default management class. The new management class does not show up in "Q inclexcl". The new management class shows
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00034.html (13,397 bytes)

14. Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:53:46 -0700
Fred, I cannot give you a definitive to answer your question since I do not know your shop, its policies, service level agreement, etc., For example, it could be your shop policy that the INCLUDE *:\
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00036.html (36,953 bytes)

15. Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: Fred Johanson <Fred AT UCHICAGO DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 11:40:44 -0600
Andy, The machine admin wasn't in on Friday, but today he reports the new mgmtc still doesn't show up. He sent along the inclexcl from this morning: ** FILE INCLUDE/EXCLUDE ** Mode Function Pattern (
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00039.html (17,208 bytes)

16. Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:28:51 -0700
Nothing wrong per se, although the second INCLUDE appears redundant. The first place to start with these kinds of issues is to use "dsmc query inclexcl" to makes sure those files aren't being picked
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00044.html (13,751 bytes)

17. [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: Fred Johanson <Fred AT UCHICAGO DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:23:35 -0600
Our desktop support unit has a user that wants a new retention policy on their file share. The admin added this to the dsm.opt: INCLUDE "F:\NSIT\FieldSupport\University Administration\Budget Office\*
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00048.html (12,033 bytes)

18. Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 14:15:18 -0700
Hi Fred, good to hear you have it straightened out. Yes, that looks correct now; notice that the drive letter is resolved to F:. Also don't forget that you want to use "...\*" at the end of the file
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00053.html (26,521 bytes)

19. Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: Fred Johanson <Fred AT UCHICAGO DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:25:16 -0600
Thanks Andy, I'll try to make this brief. I had thought of making a special cloptset for this client, but the machine admin figures that once this special exception becomes known, the other 15 to 20
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00059.html (37,884 bytes)

20. Re: [ADSM-L] INCLUDE for new management class (score: 1)
Author: Fred Johanson <Fred AT UCHICAGO DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 20:06:44 -0600
Andy, I got a note that said that all is now as the users want. thanks for the help. ________________________________ Hi Fred, good to hear you have it straightened out. Yes, that looks correct now;
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00111.html (26,636 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu